The Tinderbox

Religion, Politics, heated debate

14,369 topics in this forum

    • 37 replies
    • 404 views
    • 805 replies
    • 24,874 views
    • 19 replies
    • 158 views
    • 2 replies
    • 50 views
    • 54 replies
    • 532 views
    • 40 replies
    • 1,042 views
    • 70 replies
    • 777 views
    • 46 replies
    • 834 views
    • 33 replies
    • 677 views
    • 28 replies
    • 494 views
    • 218 replies
    • 4,557 views
    • 6 replies
    • 171 views
    • 4 replies
    • 98 views
    • 21 replies
    • 414 views
    • 1 reply
    • 66 views
    • 12 replies
    • 261 views
    • 14 replies
    • 251 views
    • 8 replies
    • 431 views
    • 6 replies
    • 133 views
    • 0 replies
    • 50 views
    • 7 replies
    • 107 views
    • 331 replies
    • 6,436 views
    • 6 replies
    • 127 views
    • 6 replies
    • 109 views
    • 157 replies
    • 2,892 views


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,319
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Basbear
    Joined
  • Posts

    • So, you deliberately said saying he's a "hit" would make anyone a homer. So what does that imply other than you saying he sucks? "I think this person sucks and this move sucks. My opinions are fact now" That essentially was your OP. If that's all the support you need, then that shows how this piece is not credible whatsoever. Sure, you're under no obligation to read it. Just shows you can't back any of your statements up, and have no credibility. I back up most of what I say with evidence and fact. You just provide conjecture and subjective opinions. Like I said, if you want to look credible, counter the evidence I presented. And this is where you expose yourself as the simpleton you are. No need to say anything about this, since this essentially was an admittance of defeat.
    • Umm..    http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/23/alexis-sanchez-agrees-four-year-contract-with-paris-saint-germain-6799303/