2,464 topics in this forum

    • 26 replies
    • 5,122 views
    • 74 replies
    • 3,121 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1,150 views
    • 3 replies
    • 755 views
    • 85 replies
    • 4,156 views
    • 134 replies
    • 7,112 views
    • 314 replies
    • 12,400 views
    • 4 replies
    • 595 views
    • 2 replies
    • 241 views
    • 15 replies
    • 745 views
    • 1 reply
    • 154 views
    • 5 replies
    • 574 views
    • 0 replies
    • 90 views
    • 2 replies
    • 371 views
    • 6 replies
    • 341 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1,073 views
    • 19 replies
    • 2,790 views
    • 4 replies
    • 377 views
    • 2 replies
    • 359 views
    • 34 replies
    • 2,327 views
    • 1 reply
    • 253 views
    • 3 replies
    • 194 views
    • 42 replies
    • 2,476 views
    • 6 replies
    • 456 views
    • 3 replies
    • 366 views


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,319
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Basbear
    Joined
  • Posts

    • So, you deliberately said saying he's a "hit" would make anyone a homer. So what does that imply other than you saying he sucks? "I think this person sucks and this move sucks. My opinions are fact now" That essentially was your OP. If that's all the support you need, then that shows how this piece is not credible whatsoever. Sure, you're under no obligation to read it. Just shows you can't back any of your statements up, and have no credibility. I back up most of what I say with evidence and fact. You just provide conjecture and subjective opinions. Like I said, if you want to look credible, counter the evidence I presented. And this is where you expose yourself as the simpleton you are. No need to say anything about this, since this essentially was an admittance of defeat.
    • Umm..    http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/23/alexis-sanchez-agrees-four-year-contract-with-paris-saint-germain-6799303/