506 topics in this forum

    • 147 replies
    • 20,329 views
    • 8 replies
    • 71 views
    • 425 replies
    • 7,767 views
    • 9 replies
    • 147 views
    • 28 replies
    • 2,402 views
    • 3 replies
    • 99 views
    • 2 replies
    • 104 views
    • 22 replies
    • 366 views
    • 305 replies
    • 11,570 views
    • 93 replies
    • 4,797 views
    • 0 replies
    • 147 views
    • 24 replies
    • 1,556 views
    • 19 replies
    • 1,227 views
    • 41 replies
    • 2,382 views
    • 452 replies
    • 10,292 views
    • 5 replies
    • 463 views
    • 6 replies
    • 361 views
    • 13 replies
    • 1,075 views
    • 300 replies
    • 6,279 views
    • 189 replies
    • 4,705 views
    • 141 replies
    • 7,996 views
    • 0 replies
    • 297 views
    • 4 replies
    • 353 views
    • 4 replies
    • 407 views
    • 1 reply
    • 258 views


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,319
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Basbear
    Joined
  • Posts

    • So, you deliberately said saying he's a "hit" would make anyone a homer. So what does that imply other than you saying he sucks? "I think this person sucks and this move sucks. My opinions are fact now" That essentially was your OP. If that's all the support you need, then that shows how this piece is not credible whatsoever. Sure, you're under no obligation to read it. Just shows you can't back any of your statements up, and have no credibility. I back up most of what I say with evidence and fact. You just provide conjecture and subjective opinions. Like I said, if you want to look credible, counter the evidence I presented. And this is where you expose yourself as the simpleton you are. No need to say anything about this, since this essentially was an admittance of defeat.
    • Umm..    http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/23/alexis-sanchez-agrees-four-year-contract-with-paris-saint-germain-6799303/