not exactly. im actually wagering that you're unwilling or unable to explain the disparity between single parent homes in the black community and other racial groups, unwilling or unable to explain why only the black community can address this issue, and unwilling or unable to explain what the community should do in response. so, which is it? unwilling or unable? unwilling is a strong possibility, given the implicit appeal to racial animus found in this brand of concern trolling. but then again, unable is also a distinct possibility, given the fact that you're really fuging stupid.
this is a weirdly coy response from someone who seems so sure of what he's saying otherwise. a statistic isn't an issue. you can't post a statistic without interpreting it and expect that to be accepted as an argument, because it's not an argument. again, what are these "major issues within the black community", why can they only be addressed by black people, and what should they be doing?
austrians try to pass off their "knowledge" as self evident; above rigorous analysis and testing. this is of course very convenient as their "knowledge" is crank bullshit that doesn't stand up to even a tiny amount of scrutiny. your economic school has much more in common with religion than with academia. austrians do not observe and interpret data, adjusting their own thoughts accordingly; instead they seek to fit the data to their preconceived generalizations. to observe the world as an austrian means to see a thing and think "now how can i interpret this so as to mean i am right?" austrian observation demands a rejection of the scientific method; a rejection of statistics. it is theology masquerading as science and its god is the market. this is why economists and other social scientists only take the time to stop ignoring the school in order to mock the school. it is a waste of resources to prop up. the world would be a better place if the wealthy few who have spent so much to keep the school from collapsing into total obscurity would have instead donated the money to charity or, hell, even set the money on fire.
yeah it's one of those hilarious jokes like when posters would get buttmad at me and suggest im on my period. you know, one of those jokes who tells you more about the comedian than the target. he can't defend his indefensible ideology and the constant state of contradiction within which he exists, so he responds to pointed criticism with clunky "jokes" that are nothing more than worthless ad hominem. worst of all, it isn't even remotely funny. the level of humor i would expect from a know nothing government bureaucrat.
you both are simply fishing for ad hominem ammunition, as rodeo previously noted. it's very transparent. your profession, from where you draw a paycheck, is in fact relevant to your stupid ideology. you have somehow managed to safely compartmentalize your career as a tax man away from your hate boner for taxes and the services which they fund. you on the other hand have decided i am a prostitute because idk, it makes you feel better about yourself? is this a normal response to cognitive dissonance? maybe so. it seems like many austrians find themselves on the dole, from politicians like rand paul to "academics" (using this term very loosely) at universities that are funded by the public both directly and through heavily subsidized federal loans. funny, isn't it?
dear dumbass, im not attacking his profession. im attacking a baby brained ideology that somehow allows a person to compare universal healthcare to slavery but to also literally be the tax man. imo we need tax men for all sorts of government services and it's a good thing that the profession exists. how you could confuse the position from which i argue with "attacking others professions" is beyond me. it all sounds very, very stupid. given who im replying to, it sounds about right. please, please stop wasting my time by cheerleading for idiots. put away the pom poms.
a friend of a friend used ashley madison to get men to pay for her college and bills. it sounded pretty unbelievable at the time but knowing now that she may have had the only active profile in north carolina, im sold
why are these "b-b-but where are the fathers???" arguments only invoked when we talk about poor outcomes in minority communities? what about white dads? why do white people consistently see better outcomes across a wide spectrum of variables? do white dads just value family more? or are white families less likely to fall victim to a cuckolding government? you're talking about culture and dressing it up in a way to fit your preferred social and political ends. good day sir
no that's not at all what im saying idk, but that is certainly an argument that is advanced not only here but on the national stage. for example:
the problem im hoping to address is that many people appeal to the supposed inferiority of minority groups by crying "personal responsibility", as if the disparity between outcomes can be attributed to the individual. thus, when a group of these "irresponsible" individuals suffers poor outcomes, the group is inferior. they don't value family. they don't think about the harmful effects of prison. they just want to be cool, with their drug dealing hip hop culture. why do i reference communism? this is the state of american politics. any attempt to address an unequal system will be met with cries of "communism", likely because any intervention is a reminder that the free market only exists and functions well inside college classrooms