g5jamz

The man is a moron. Why are we so surprised every time this happens?

It's puts the onus on the legislative branch, which is where it should be.

Libs need to get their talking points in order. Do insurance companies need subsidies/bailouts for Obamacare despite record profits?

Then they shouldn't need the subsidies then...amirite?

This preceded Trump by a very long while...and it's a huge problem. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/10/us/politics/marco-rubio-obamacare-affordable-care-act.html Here's the issue. It's obvious that when you have a large influx of new people on these program there will be costs incurred by the private insurance companies to cover the shortfall. Federal government stepped in and provided subsidies, aka bailouts, to these insurance companies to help with this. Here's the thing...health insurance companies have been bailing out of Obamacare WITH the subsidies. That should tell you something about the solvency of Obamacare. This is just a band-aid being ripped off the insurance companies to provide or get out of the marketplace. This was a bad law. Period.

You're right. It was a bill written without proper funding vehicles. Sound familiar?

Camping situations will be increasingly difficult to accommodate both girls and boys. I don't know why the GS couldn't just develop an Eagle Scout equivalent. But to each their own...seems they are just in a competitive pissing match.

Exactly right. There were no provisions to continue these subsidies. Want them fixed? Fix it. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-healthcare/trump-scraps-key-obamacare-subsidies-urges-democrats-to-fix-broken-mess-idUSKBN1CI0E4?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=59e0207a04d3016f0c85f0ad&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter This is why. Obama didn't properly fund the program. Where have we heard this before. Same result with single payer nonsense from a federal level. Let California do their thing. It it's cost sustainable, then other states would do the obvious.

THIS...is bs.

These are girls? Not young women. And GS have on their FAQ that they aren't directly affiliated with PP, but they are a member of some international orgs that do support it. They can do whatever they want, I'm just pointing out the recent divide that's caused people to reconsider sending their daughters through the program.

Are you suggesting the only thing girl scouts do is sell cookies? Has anyone seen the statement from the Girl Scouts this morning? It's pretty hateful. They have taken a hit over their cookie-pushing tactics and indirect affiliation with prochoice groups.

Man the Girl Scouts are pissed.

https://mobile.twitter.com/diddy/status/917903094708690944?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Famericanewshub.com%2Frapper-p-diddy-says-can-fix-nfl-just-get-rid-white-people2%2F lol

Just rename them now. I am interested in hearing why a girl would feel the need to join the Boy Scouts versus the Girl Scouts.

I'm ashamed of Trump, especially when he was a democrat.