Jump to content

g5jamz

HUDDLER
  • Content count

    23,114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,279 Awesome

4 Followers

About g5jamz

  • Rank
    Is back
  • Birthday August 26

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Converted

  • Location
    Raleigh, NC

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    https://mobile.twitter.com/TomCottonAR/status/1042468014367678464?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1042468014367678464&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2018%2F09%2F20%2Fdianne-feinstein-twas-media-outed-kavanaughs-accuser%2F Feinstein blaming the media is gold
  2. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    Is the burden of the proof on the accused or the accuser? Also from Cokie Roberts https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/christine-blasey-ford-made-choice-now-story-senate/story?id=57932425
  3. g5jamz

    Woman says God saved her truck driver husband

    There is only 'one way' according to christians and the Bible. Modern conservatism isn't built on telling you ways you won't get in. It's built on telling you ways/temptations that create barriers between you and him. This is why my first question, and I've repeated myself numerous times on here, was about what was the answer you wanted and why do you deserve to know intent.
  4. g5jamz

    Woman says God saved her truck driver husband

    Who's worshipping the rich. I'm not one of the prosperity preacher followers. That's a whole other rabbit hole. I simply asked you what you feel is the only way to get closer to God/Jesus. You've stated that being rich is a block. That's not what was being said. You're not going to buy your way into heaven with your wealth OR your good works, because in those times wealth was taught by priests as direct blessings by God. So either learn what is being said, or keep regurgitating nonsense.
  5. g5jamz

    Woman says God saved her truck driver husband

    Really? What you quoted isn't what you think it is, but often used in error. You tell us what is the only way to be closer to him (according to christians).
  6. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    Glad to see liberals finally get serious about rapists. Find them, jail them, castrate them if they cannot control themselves.
  7. g5jamz

    Woman says God saved her truck driver husband

    What was the answer you expected and why do you feel you’re deserving of an answer.
  8. g5jamz

    California has the nation’s highest poverty rate

    They have entire communities of homeless. You'd think liberals would've solved homelessness/poverty in the areas/states solely run by them. https://www.statista.com/statistics/727847/homelessness-rate-in-the-us-by-state/ https://www.usich.gov/tools-for-action/map/#fn[]=1500&fn[]=2900&fn[]=6100&fn[]=10100&fn[]=14100&all_types=true&year=2017
  9. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    That’s because the FBI had jurisdiction, because the allegations were made while Thomas was in a federal agency.
  10. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    According to liberals. Same for Supreme court justices.
  11. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    https://www.mediaite.com/uncategorized/mika-if-christine-forde-wont-testify-what-are-republicans-supposed-to-do-but-demand-a-vote/
  12. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    The FBI has done prior background checks. This is a new unfounded allegation regarding a 36 year old case where they have no jurisdiction over any investigation. They haver her statement. They have his and Judge's statement. It's done. What more needs to be investigated as you have the potential 3 witnesses, no location/time/place, no circumstantial evidence. That's what you are going with?
  13. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    There's no constitutional mandate to have a FBI background check on judges.
  14. g5jamz

    Brett Kavanaugh Can't be Bothered

    Someone explain how the FBI has jurisdiction over a 36 year old case involving minors?
×