R0CKnR0LLA

HUDDLER
  • Content count

    11,151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6,150 Fuggin Awesome

About R0CKnR0LLA

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location Las Vegas, NV

Converted

  • Location Charlotte, NC
  1. I'm making stuff up? How much have you had to drink dude, jesus. This is what you said: "Before yall start grabbing your pitch forks why don't you let the dude actually practice first? You think you fuging knee jerkers would have learned by now. Just because you personally don't know who he is doesn't make him a bad pick, who the fug are you? It takes 3 years to evaluate a draft class not 10 fuging minutes after the 2nd god damn pick." Give the guy 3 years to evaluate before you call it a bad pick, but you don't say that to anyone making positive comments on this or our 1st round pick. Positive comments 30 seconds after a pick is made - sounds good to me! Negative comment 30 seconds after a pick is made - WOAH WOAH WOAH, why the knee jerk reaction! You need to give him 3 years before you say anything! Who the fug are you?! Put down the pitchfork!!
  2. OK, that's fine. I will say it's a bit different taking a relative unknown or small school project in the 5th round vs 2nd round, I think that's the main issue people have with the pick. If we got him in the 4th or 5th it would be much more understandable.
  3. lol NFL.com was 3rd-4th, WF was 3rd-5th Let me just totally skew facts to try to make a point lol
  4. I just pointed out that your opinion is wrong and makes no sense logically, you blasted people for making negative comments about a draft pick because they need to wait years to see how the guy develops, but somehow its OK to make positive comments immediately after a pick is made, no waiting required. it's just stupid and makes no sense
  5. if your opinion is that nobody should be able to say anything negative about a draft pick and the entire message board should be some "rah rah" circle jerk then yeah, that's pretty stupid and you should keep it to yourself
  6. I must remember it different, I thought people were reasonably happy with both of those picks. The only pick of DGs I've seen as many people calling a huge reach was Kugbila, and they ended up being right.
  7. your whole post was just to blast people for having opinions without sharing anything useful so yeah
  8. It's called having an opinion, this is a message board where people share opinions in case you haven't noticed. But somehow you think people should be OK to say a pick is good, but not to say that it's bad.
  9. GD, I'm almost scared to see who we pick in the 3rd FFS
  10. Funny, don't see you saying that to anyone that says our picks have been good ones. I guess it's OK to say a pick is good right after it's made but not OK to say it's bad.
  11. I would have been stoked picking Fuller there. This guy you could have easily taken in the 4th or 5th. Just a total WTF moment
  12. This looks like a MASSIVE reach. Combined with our 1st rounder that will be lucky to play 20-30% of snaps and this draft is starting to look like a disaster.
  13. 2016 NFL Draft Round 2 General Discussion

    Pats are horrible at drafting TBH
  14. 2016 NFL Draft Round 2 General Discussion

    Bucs are in full melt down mode after that pick LMAO
  15. 2016 NFL Draft Round 2 General Discussion

    lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll oh noes, someone might take that kicker ahead of us, TRADE UP!!!