Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 3 votes

Bill Voth says no tackle in the first


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#16 El Chingon

El Chingon

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:25 PM

Another good point:

 

Yes, receivers’ coach Ricky Proehl has been sent all around the country for a reason. The Panthers are turning over every wideout rock they can, not just because it’s a need, but because there’s a whole bunch of talent out there.



#17 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,346 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:30 PM

What I get from his post is that we can double dip at WR in 1st and 2nd rounds because WR talent in this draft is insane.



#18 El Chingon

El Chingon

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:30 PM

Bill Voth is the new Darin Gantt, only much better.



#19 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,602 posts
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:34 PM

I agree with him. After the top OTs (which almost certainly will be gone) the guys left all seem to be about the same talent level as guys who will be available in the 2nd or even 3rd round. The value at WR should be much better. Unless a top 10 guy drops all the way to 28 I think we'll go WR in the 1st, and then land an OT in the 2nd/3rd (possibly both).



#20 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • ALL-PRO
  • 9,900 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:41 PM

I will not be surprised by anything. I just want good football players

#21 nagai

nagai

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,207 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:42 PM

Yeah, I think if the Panthers pick a 1st round tackle, it'll be a surprise like Bitiono. The 2nd and 3rd tier WR's are more enticing to me than the OT's going at that range. Talented players from other positions that drop are also attractive.



#22 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • ALL-PRO
  • 5,295 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:46 PM

I will not be surprised by anything. I just want good football players


Kuechly broke me from getting too worked up over what I thought we needed. Just take the best football player and it will all work out. We have a good GM, let him do work.

#23 ctrcat

ctrcat

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:47 PM

One thing we know for a fact, that we are the team of the decade. You don't draft the GOAT, the best MLB of a generation, and the best run stuffer and one of the top overall players of an entire class in three years and NOT be the team of the decade. No no matter who we pick, it will be the right guy, and he will be a part of greatness.

#24 RoaringRiot

RoaringRiot

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,973 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:04 PM

It's CB in the first round. Don't be upset .

#25 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,604 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:08 PM

This seems to fly in the face of folks who think that need will be big factor in determining Gettleman's BPA philosophy. Sure he could take a tackle or wide receiver or corner or other position. But it will be based on who they think is the BPA not the BPA at a position of need.

I know some teams use need as a part of their weighting system for a players when grading them.

But really all that means IMO is that if there are two players with the same score need would give that player the edge.

#26 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 41,454 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:26 PM

Get what he's saying. Not so sure I buy his reasoning.

#27 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,963 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:29 PM

I know some teams use need as a part of their weighting system for a players when grading them.

But really all that means IMO is that if there are two players with the same score need would give that player the edge.

No doubt many teams use need as a big factor and that included us under Hurney as well.  I just don't think it as big a factor with Gettleman.  Honestly I could see him taking a TE or a DE if they were the BPA.  He knows that after a few years of constantly doing BPA regardless of position you build the overall talent of the team.



#28 thomas96

thomas96

    DIZZY

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,836 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:30 PM

This is exactly what I've been saying, and I hope this is true. OT value at 28 is not worth that pick unless its Lewan. Gotta got BPA at position of need which will very very likely be wideout.



#29 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,940 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:31 PM

Kuechly broke me from getting too worked up over what I thought we needed. Just take the best football player and it will all work out. We have a good GM, let him do work.


Same, just get good football players and hope that need and value match up

#30 Carolina_Crazy

Carolina_Crazy

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 219 posts

Posted 24 April 2014 - 10:33 PM

@billvoth: @VagusNC panthers believe OT value at 28 would be reaching

I agree!!!!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com