Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jarhead

Coach: Protecting Cam top priority

48 posts in this topic

Fix the OL this year the WR position next year. With time bad receivers flourish.

I'm sorry but you must not have any draft knowledge because your statement is very ignorant. If anything this year we fix WR and fix OL next year. Your talking 5 blue chip OL this year compared to 20 to 30 blue chip WRs.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but you must not have any draft knowledge because your statement is very ignorant. If anything this year we fix WR and fix OL next year. Your talking 5 blue chip OL this year compared to 20 to 30 blue chip WRs.

 

Couldn't agree more and the 5 OL will be off the board before we pick. And then we would be in dangerous when you reach you get screwed range in gettlman terms.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but you must not have any draft knowledge because your statement is very ignorant. If anything this year we fix WR and fix OL next year. Your talking 5 blue chip OL this year compared to 20 to 30 blue chip WRs.

 

If this is true, under those conditions wouldn't it make more sense to take the OL early (i.e. less of a dropoff waiting on receivers)?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oline or Wr in the 1st doesn't matter to me as long as we dedicate this draft to the offense.

best hope offense is bpa then. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This does not mean T is the #1 pick, but I am happy they said it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1) Marqise Lee, WR, Southern California

(2) Joel Bitonio, OT, Nevada

(3) Marcus Roberson, CB, Florida

(4) Jack Mewhort, OT, Ohio State

(5) Chris Watt, OG, Notre Dame

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

best hope offense is bpa then. Lol

With all the talent at needed position I don't see why it shouldn't be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because RR made this statement, it doesn't mean that an OL will be drafted first, or as top priority (over others) by the Panthers. 

 

This sounds more like a team/coaching desire (and answer to a question of course), which makes perfect sense, regardless of how they draft. 

 

Plus, both good receivers and lineman, can protect Cam in the extended definition. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From on outsiders perspective I get the impression Rivera doesn't value players on the perimeter as much as Gettleman does (or as much as he should.)

When you add in absolutely everything, from Rivera reportedly pushing for Kugbila last year with Gettleman against the pick, to Gettleman's comments last year on offensive line units needing time to develop rather than names, to Gettleman's draft history/philosophy, to Rivera's and Gettleman's slight "opposing" comments here, and so on and so on, that's just the impression I get.

In other words, the contingent that thinks they're being wise by saying OL/BPA at every opportunity may have to pick a side because it doesn't look as if the team feels the two coincide (as if thats news)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How in gods name do you confuse Avant with Cason

 

Antonie Avant, Jason Cason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Antonie Avant, Jason Cason

 

Seems legit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites