Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

firefox1234

Trading later round picks

Trading 6th and 7th rd picks   21 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we trade our 6th or 7th rd picks more often to move up in the early rounds?

    • Yes, they are useless picks
      14
    • No, quality players can be found in the later rounds
      7

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

14 posts in this topic

I would say yes if a quality player is just out of reach especially around the 3rd to 4th rds where quality can be found

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who gives a poo unless you're looking for a pro bowl caliber fullback really

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wasnt greg hardy a 6th round pick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it. What did the saints give up to move up to 20 in order to draft cooks? a 5th rounder and their 1st? 

 

worth it in my opinion. It's when you go full hurney and trade away future high draft picks that you get in trouble. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it. What did the saints give up to move up to 20 in order to draft cooks? a 5th rounder and their 1st?

worth it in my opinion. It's when you go full hurney and trade away future high draft picks that you get in trouble.

1st and 3rd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

exceptions don't make the rule..  for the most part they are useless picks.  If a GM has his eyes on a guy and only has to give up 6's and 7's to do so then by all means don't think twice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wasnt greg hardy a 6th round pick?

Good point but in all honesty that was as lucky as most teams will get, u can most likely find just as many quality guys as UDFAs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C - depends on a lot of other factors

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not as cut and dried as your options would suggest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WaPo isn't partners with the CIA. Amazon Web Services, which sells servers to thousands upon thousands of companies and websites, sold servers to the CIA. You can buy your own now right here. Does that make you partners with the WaPo? https://aws.amazon.com When Jimmy Dore says "600 million dollars is more than the Washington Post is even worth!" he's being a dumbass. The Washington Post didn't make the deal with the CIA so what they're worth is irrelevant. Amazon Web Services sold them servers, and they happen to have the same parent company as the Washington Post. The thing about Jimmy Dore is that he is absolutely utterly obsessed with Hillary Clinton. Like, utterly obsessed. Everything goes back to Hillary Clinton to him, and his obsession has morphed into skepticism of the Russian investigation, because he views it as an excuse for why Hillary lost. He can't accept the Russia stuff being true because if it's true then maybe Clinton didn't lose on merit. And so his skepticism of the Russia investigation has led him down the path of 'well the Deep State is conspiring against Trump' and 'the Deep State is the real true evil.' He fact-checks nothing. It's Alex Jones level poo.
    • Anyone who can equate any modern presidency at any moment in time with the embarrassment we see right now is off their gd rocker. What is really telling is that we now see that Trump can't just be casual.  He can't just talk it up with other peers.  He can't just chill the f*ck out. Seriously....people like this are weird as hell.   It's been obvious he's the head of a business but not a business savvy guy since the Apprentice.  I don't understand why we want the Sharknado meets 80s bad guy of Presidents.