This is not a good argument and is out of context-Signing a TE was part of a list of moves the front office made recently. Tell me, could I have meant that this is how the front office is fixing the problem? If I say that is what I meant and it is logical, then let it go.
lol I think you basically just thought he was a lot better than what he is, then when presented with facts about how bad he was last season you realized that you can't justifiably say he will contribute immensely to out weight the lost of other receivers or to form a dynamic duo of tight ends, his signing is based purely on potential and even then a guy who has chance after chance to show his potential and doesn't.....just isn't a very liable receiving threat. His signing was miniscule and I don't expect him to contribute greatly to any of the issues already presented in this thread. His catch percentage of balls thrown his way is lower than any receiver who was on our team last season, statistically he's not even an upgrade lol.
And the whole "addressed" vs "fixed" thing, now you're just arguing semantics....and kinda contradicting points you've already made, you've already implied that he will assume a pass catching #2 tight end role, I never disagreed with that I simply said dude isn't that good and I don't think he will be like Shockey for us a few seasons back, shockey had a lot of versatility and intangibles...
Edited by hdevonxz, 20 May 2014 - 09:55 AM.