Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Study finds strong evidence for discriminatory intent behind voter ID laws


  • Please log in to reply
329 replies to this topic

#1 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 05 June 2014 - 01:53 PM

 

Demonstrating racial bias is not easy -- as I've discussed before, nobody actually calls themselves racists, because much racial bias happens at the subconscious level -- so the USC researchers developed a novel real-world field experiment to test bias among state legislators. In the two weeks prior to the 2012 election, they sent e-mail correspondence to a total of 1,871 state legislators in 14 states. The e-mails read as follows:

Hello (Representative/Senator NAME),

My name is (voter NAME) and I have heard a lot in the news lately about identification being required at the polls. I do not have a driver’s license. Can I still vote in November? Thank you for your help.

Sincerely,
(voter NAME)

The key to the experiment lies in that voter name field. One group of legislators received e-mail from a voter who identified himself as "Jacob Smith." The other received email from "Santiago Rodriguez." Moreover, half of the legislators in each of these two groups received e-mails written in Spanish, while half received English-language e-mails.

 

The researchers then measured the lawmakers' response rates to these e-mails. Crucially, in each state in the study, legislators really could have simply responded with a "yes" -- drivers' licenses were not required in any of the states in order to vote.

The researchers found that legislators who had supported voter ID laws were much more likely to respond to "Jacob Smith" than to "Santiago Rodriguez." This gap reveals a preference for responding to constituents with Anglophone names over constituents with Hispanic ones.

There was also an Anglophone preference among legislators who had not backed ID requirements, but crucially this preference was much smaller. This finding held true among legislators who received English-language e-mails, as well as legislators who received Spanish e-mails.

 

voter-id1.jpg

 

File under "N" for "No poo, Sherlock"

 

http://www.washingto...-voter-id-laws/

 

 



#2 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 13,609
  • Reputation: 4,288
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:07 PM

Poor Santiago :(

#3 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,037
  • Reputation: 2,231
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:10 PM

This study didn't only look at racism.  It also may have caught on to politicians biases towards who they think would vote for them.  It should have included in the email a desire to vote for the candidate emailed.



#4 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:10 PM

That's settled science at work.

 

Shame a majority of americans/and North Carolinians support it. 



#5 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,445
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:14 PM

Those idiots (yes Del, I am talking about you) that claim having to show an ID to vote "discriminates" against anyone really do not even know the definition of the word "discriminate".

 

The law requires everyone (every race, gender, age, etc) to show an ID.  The SAME type of ID mind you.....and will provide you with a free one if you can't affor one.   

 

As such, the law ,as it is written, is the complete OPPOSITE of disciminatory.

 

Carry on



#6 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • Joined: 22-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,247
  • Reputation: 4,031
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:15 PM

i'm pretty sure i'm a racist

 

but i don't want to stop people from thailand from voting


Edited by Porn Shop Clerk, 05 June 2014 - 02:16 PM.


#7 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,880
  • Reputation: 9,441
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:20 PM

like voting matters....lol



#8 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,922
  • Reputation: 7,769
  • LocationCharlotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:20 PM

Those idiots (yes Del, I am talking about you) that claim having to show an ID to vote "discriminates" against anyone really do not even know the definition of the word "discriminate".

 

The law requires everyone (every race, gender, age, etc) to show an ID.  The SAME type of ID mind you.....and will provide you with a free one if you can't affor one.   

 

As such, the law ,as it is written, is the complete OPPOSITE of disciminatory.

 

Carry on

 

Well if this caucasian man says it is not discriminatory, then it must be true. You can all go back about your business now.


Edited by TheRed, 05 June 2014 - 02:24 PM.


#9 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,880
  • Reputation: 9,441
HUDDLER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:25 PM

how do people get anything done without an ID? good thing we are up in arms about this...next take on the banks so I can get money without ID. 



#10 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 13,609
  • Reputation: 4,288
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 June 2014 - 02:27 PM

I was discriminated against when I came from Ukraine so I changed my name. Boom bitches!

I noticed while I was in college, people with American names more likely to get a job interview than foreigners.

Edited by ARSEN, 05 June 2014 - 02:28 PM.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users