Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Should parents of multiple children pay more in taxes instead of less?


  • Please log in to reply
145 replies to this topic

#16 PandaPancake

PandaPancake

    #FireShula

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,799 posts
  • LocationGreeley, Co

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:02 PM

unless you start making more money

I'm happy where I'm at.

 

single.png



#17 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,935 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:17 PM

i have no idea what brith is, but the guy probably got an A anyway


brith (ˈbrɪt)

Judaism ritual circumcision of male babies, usually at eight days old, regarded as the formal entry of the child to the Jewish community


http://dictionary.re...om/browse/brith

#18 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 17,484 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:23 PM

I'm happy where I'm at.

 

single.png

 

 

According to the chart, if you get taxed 35% exactly, then you make $932,266.29

 

 

Congratulations
 



#19 PandaPancake

PandaPancake

    #FireShula

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,799 posts
  • LocationGreeley, Co

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:30 PM

According to the chart, if you get taxed 35% exactly, then you make $932,266.29

 

 

Congratulations
 

 

No where near that actually.



#20 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 17,484 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:33 PM

No where near that actually.

 

I figured.  Actually I was thinking "he wasn't taking into account the lower brackets.  I wonder how much he would actually have to make to get taxed 35%?"

 

Then I voluntarily did algebra to figure out what it would be.

 

For fun.

 

(Nerd Alert)



#21 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • ALL-PRO
  • 7,109 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:36 PM

I have no issue with paying tax toward public schools. It's for the greater good and I understand that. But people around here where i live have a bit of taxes going toward bridge maintenance. But just as a toll charges the people who use the bridge the most, there should be a tax on people who have over a set number of children. Seems like we'd be hearing less about problems with school funding and teacher salaries. Not to mention people might think about having kids more thoroughly who can't afford them, which would help in the money spent on public assistance to people with babies who can't afford them.

#22 PandaPancake

PandaPancake

    #FireShula

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,799 posts
  • LocationGreeley, Co

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:38 PM

I figured.  Actually I was thinking "he wasn't taking into account the lower brackets.  I wonder how much he would actually have to make to get taxed 35%?"

 

Then I voluntarily did algebra to figure out what it would be.

 

For fun.

 

(Nerd Alert)

 

I always make the mistake of totaling how much the government in total robs from me. That's federal, state, local, and those other things.

 

I can't wait until I'm a 1099 employee again.



#23 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,000 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 17 June 2014 - 01:59 PM

If a person got tax credits for their kid graduating at least high school it may make them consider mult kids since its a back end credit and not current.
The tax base for a kid doesnt happen until they are at least 18 and making money enough to get taxed.


Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

#24 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,247 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:02 PM

why not end the war on drugs and use the money to offer each student 25k to graduate high school

 

with money left over



#25 PandaPancake

PandaPancake

    #FireShula

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,799 posts
  • LocationGreeley, Co

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:08 PM

why not end the war on drugs and use the money to offer each student 25k to graduate high school

 

with money left over

 

You can't end the war on drugs. What would happen then? Its not like Colorado and Washington legalizing marijuana cut into 3 billion dollars of revenue for cartels.



#26 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,247 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:12 PM

yes, we can't end the biggest waste of resources in the history of the world, that would just be terrible

 

the worst thing is all the dea and police officers would lose their jobs, and then we'd have a bunch of mass murdering rapists running around unemployed



#27 PandaPancake

PandaPancake

    #FireShula

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,799 posts
  • LocationGreeley, Co

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:13 PM

I've never met a DEA agent that wasn't crooked.



#28 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 24,327 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:18 PM

I could say the same thing about an oilman



#29 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,465 posts
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:23 PM

Yep...people with more kids increase the tax base

 

That assumes that all of those kids become productive members of society and not another statistic is gov't entitlement programs.



#30 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,026 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:48 PM

That assumes that all of those kids become productive members of society and not another statistic is gov't entitlement programs.

 

Or trust fund babies that look for any loophole they can find once they are afforded adequate education because their parents can pay for it or a corporate position because of "who you know not what you know"...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com