Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ecu88

Hot in Herre

86 posts in this topic

You show how little you know about the subject every time you say something about it.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Come on my little professor of climate change. You are like a squeaky wheel and I am just the WD 40 here to quite you. What is this your, I'm rubber you are glue argument.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my "I'm not a climate scientist, neither are you, but I listen to actual climate scientists on the subject and you don't" argument.

Interested in hearing your ideas on how rocket scientists fake everything for research money as well.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting for your facts to counter argue the self researching blogger that researched for himself.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they were not corrected?

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

they were corrected, but NASA isn't about to go back and "correct" past news releases from more than a decade ago to fix the issues... they issued a statement and corrected the data in 2007 and have been using corrected numbers since.  They aren't going to edit a 1999 brief to correct the figures in it tho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The political notion that global warming is an imminent threat is hoopla or as Biden says it malarkey. How can models with deviation for a year be as accurate as the actual measurement through a simple thermostat? Implausible, I will talk to only people that work in reality. Bye CWG, go back to the Matrix.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

so you can't think of a single possible reason why a temperature reading from a single thermometer in any given area may not be accurate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my "I'm not a climate scientist, neither are you, but I listen to actual climate scientists on the subject and you don't" argument.

Interested in hearing your ideas on how rocket scientists fake everything for research money as well.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Apples and oranges. Rocket science is concrete compared to climate studies. Correlations are harder to find when there is still so much to learn in that field. Climate studies is very much like psychology, lots of abstractions. Both are real sciences and both are still growing in understanding something that does not have just a limited amount variables.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the facts. 97 percent of scientists understand man is influencing global weather. the 3 percent that don't agree tend of be less knowledgable about it, just like you.

Anything you can think to throw at this fact is doomed to fail.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so you can't think of a single possible reason why a temperature reading from a single thermometer in any given area may not be accurate?

Nice out of context, my argument is one of actual figures not one of model calculations.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice out of context, my argument is one of actual figures not one of model calculations.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

so to put it in context, should the urban heat island effect be corrected or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites