Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Isportsweb: Raiders need to trade Moore


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#16 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,666 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 26 June 2014 - 09:45 AM

I think your link is faulty, dude.

 

The story I got was talking about their O-Line.



#17 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,441 posts

Posted 26 June 2014 - 09:49 AM

he has much more big play potential than Lafell ever did, so that makes him more valuable than him off the bat even if their consistency issues are about equal.  that said, i think DG feels the roster is set and I'd be surprised if he brings in a WR at this point.



#18 googoodan

googoodan

    Memberest

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,648 posts
  • LocationBayside

Posted 26 June 2014 - 12:59 PM

No, it resulted in the shipping off of an unfocused RB (Goodson) for a hulking LT (Campbell) who never saw the field.


oooh good catch.
now that I think about it, didn't we get goodson's pick with the same trade that got us hardy's pick?

#19 The Huddler

The Huddler

    St. Thomas Aquinas

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,481 posts
  • LocationRadford University

Posted 26 June 2014 - 01:08 PM

Call me a tard but I'm very confident in our current WRs. Much better for what we want to do than last season

Edited by The Huddler, 26 June 2014 - 01:13 PM.


#20 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,093 posts
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE

Posted 26 June 2014 - 01:31 PM

I think your link is faulty, dude.

 

The story I got was talking about their O-Line.

 

Thanks. Fixed!  

 

http://isportsweb.co...denarius-moore/



#21 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Administrators
  • 13,519 posts
  • LocationILM

Posted 26 June 2014 - 02:48 PM

This would be a good move.

#22 The Huddler

The Huddler

    St. Thomas Aquinas

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,481 posts
  • LocationRadford University

Posted 26 June 2014 - 02:51 PM

Why is Oak trying to get rid of him.


Good player..." Fug we gotta get rid of this guy"

#23 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,666 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 26 June 2014 - 03:35 PM

 

This...

 

However his inconsistency has held him back from elite levels. He struggles with drops and hot reads, which have put him in the coach’s doghouse.

 

...gives me pause :unsure:



#24 GoCarolina8990

GoCarolina8990

    All Day

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,631 posts

Posted 26 June 2014 - 03:41 PM

Call me a tard but I'm very confident in our current WRs. Much better for what we want to do than last season

 

I always agree wid dis nigga



#25 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,093 posts
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE

Posted 26 June 2014 - 04:24 PM

This...

 

 

...gives me pause :unsure:

 

OK. Sure Moore hasn't displayed the best hands, but they aren't the worst. He had a 7% drop rate in 2013. which also happens to be the exact rate that LaFell had last season. But keeping things in perspective, there are guys like Kenny Britt, Cecil Shorts,  Tavon Austin, Wes Welker, Brandon Marshall and some others with a worse drop percentage. Hell, even Reggie Wayne and Stevie Johnson were at 6.9%. 

 

As far as the hot reads, I don't know.  I do know that Proehl is one of the best in the business, and I believe that he could help Moore develop a lot. It's not like Moore would be coming in with expectations to be our primary receiver, but to have that other legit play maker on the field would keep defenses honest. Unlike LaFell who basically just couldn't get open or be the focal point of the offense, Moore has proven that he can. To me, a 6th round pick is not too much to pay for a guy with Moore's upside, particularly for a team that needs legitimate weapons and is can see the light at the end of the tunnel in regards to competing for championships.



#26 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,947 posts

Posted 26 June 2014 - 04:31 PM

I wouldn't mind it but I'm fine with our WR.. The only trade I would run for if it was a #1 WR or a Dominant #2 WR... Still would rather have a tackle 



#27 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,442 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 26 June 2014 - 04:32 PM

If he's in the coaches dog house in Oakland for inconsistency, I'm not sure he's going to fare much better here with Rivera.


Edited by TheRed, 26 June 2014 - 04:35 PM.


#28 nickzz

nickzz

    o

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,771 posts

Posted 26 June 2014 - 06:00 PM

If he's in the coaches dog house in Oakland for inconsistency, I'm not sure he's going to fare much better here with Rivera.


he could be more motivated to play for a contender

#29 EMSMedic79

EMSMedic79

    Member since 2005

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,725 posts
  • LocationOn the Water

Posted 26 June 2014 - 06:25 PM

He's never had a receiving coach like Proehl.. Just sayin.



#30 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,549 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 26 June 2014 - 06:53 PM

Moore could be a very dominant #2 WR.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com