Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Graham ruled a tight end


  • Please log in to reply
120 replies to this topic

#13 PantherWake

PantherWake

    How Bout Dem Gamecocks

  • Joined: 30-June 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,216
  • Reputation: 1,917
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:19 PM

He's not gonna be a Saint for much longer.



#14 saints4life25

saints4life25

    Resident Saints Fan!

  • Joined: 10-October 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 801
  • Reputation: 311
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:26 PM

He said he wouldn't be happy if he was tagged. This is all business. He's still gonna get paid. I don't even understand how anybody can try to make the Saints the bad guy in this. Nobody is a bad guy. Jimmy has a right to try to get as much money as he can. Saints have a right to want to pay him at the position at which he was drafted/ used.

#15 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,582
  • Reputation: 1,271
  • LocationMatthews, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:29 PM

I hope that $5 mill they saved will be worth it when he leaves to play with Tom Brady and gets paid fairly.  I'm not Jimmy fan, but I feel he got shafted.  The rules clearly state that if you lined up a majority of the time at one position you get paid as such, he was like 70% of the time lined up as a WR I think?  The guy led the league in TDs last year..... stay classy Saints.



#16 saints4life25

saints4life25

    Resident Saints Fan!

  • Joined: 10-October 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 801
  • Reputation: 311
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:35 PM

I hope that $5 mill they saved will be worth it when he leaves to play with Tom Brady and gets paid fairly. I'm not Jimmy fan, but I feel he got shafted. The rules clearly state that if you lined up a majority of the time at one position you get paid as such, he was like 70% of the time lined up as a WR I think? The guy led the league in TDs last year..... stay classy Saints.


So when he gets paid more than Gronk, he won't be getting paid "fairly"? It was 67% of the time he was lined up in the slot. That has as much to do with his deficiencies as a blocker as it does anything. Tell me, if he was ruled a wide receiver, would his records for tight ends in the record books be erased? Would he be on the Pro-Bowl ballot as a WR?

#17 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,582
  • Reputation: 1,271
  • LocationMatthews, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:41 PM

So when he gets paid more than Gronk, he won't be getting paid "fairly"? It was 67% of the time he was lined up in the slot. That has as much to do with his deficiencies as a blocker as it does anything. Tell me, if he was ruled a wide receiver, would his records for tight ends in the record books be erased? Would he be on the Pro-Bowl ballot as a WR?

 

It doesn't really matter what you or I think, the rules clearly state that he should be paid as a WR.  I'm honestly surprised the NFLPA isn't throwing hands in air over this. 

 

I'm not sure there are rules of the Pro Bowl as in position eligibility but it's probably a different set of rules so therefore, it doesn't really matter how the ruling went for a franchise tag, same with records, where there is also defined requirements. 



#18 saints4life25

saints4life25

    Resident Saints Fan!

  • Joined: 10-October 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 801
  • Reputation: 311
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:43 PM

It doesn't really matter what you or I think, the rules clearly state that he should be paid as a WR. I'm honestly surprised the NFLPA isn't throwing hands in air over this.

I'm not sure there are rules of the Pro Bowl as in position eligibility but it's probably a different set of rules so therefore, it doesn't really matter how the ruling went for a franchise tag, same with records, where there is also defined requirements.


What the rules don't clearly state is where the tight end position is suppose to line up. Tight ends have been split out wide since Kellen Winslow and Mike Ditka. I'm sure there were numbers on the percent of snaps other tight ends lined up split out that were taken into consideration.

#19 thomas96

thomas96

    DIZZY

  • Joined: 26-January 14
  • posts: 5,506
  • Reputation: 4,474
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:50 PM

He'll appeal and possibly win it on an appeal. And if he doesn't he'll certainly holdout and cause the Aints a lot of headaches. I love the situation either way because they don't have the cap room to pay him any more than the TE tag. Idiots.

#20 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,582
  • Reputation: 1,271
  • LocationMatthews, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:51 PM

What the rules don't clearly state is where the tight end position is suppose to line up. Tight ends have been split out wide since Kellen Winslow and Mike Ditka. I'm sure there were numbers on the percent of snaps other tight ends lined up split out that were taken into consideration.

 

So that is a problem the NFLPA and whatnot need to figure out, but just because their rules are old fashioned doesn't mean it doesn't state that he should get WR money. 



#21 BANE

BANE

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 892
  • Reputation: 506
  • LocationCollege
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:53 PM

Tell me, if he was ruled a wide receiver, would his records for tight ends in the record books be erased? Would he be on the Pro-Bowl ballot as a WR?

 

This. Graham was a TE. Period. HE was drafted as a TE, played as a TE and considers himself a TE. 

 

If Graham is going to be considered and paid as a WR, then ALL his records as a TE should be erased. 

 

This whole situation is nothing more than a greedy pig wanting more money. Good win for the Saints org. I HATE defending the Saints and this ass hat has made me do that. F**k you Jimmy!


Edited by BANE, 02 July 2014 - 12:53 PM.


#22 BANE

BANE

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 892
  • Reputation: 506
  • LocationCollege
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:56 PM

So that is a problem the NFLPA and whatnot need to figure out, but just because their rules are old fashioned doesn't mean it doesn't state that he should get WR money. 

 

He doesnt need WR money because the bum isn't a WR. He's a TE. When he was drafted, they called him a TE. On the Saints roster it says TE. On Grahams own f'ing personal twitter account it says TIGHT END. He's a TE, the clown just wants a fatter check than the exorbitant amount of money the guy already has. 



#23 jasonluckydog

jasonluckydog

    Honorary Honeydick Member

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • posts: 13,874
  • Reputation: 3,577
  • LocationGATOR CREEK- SC
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 01:01 PM

I love it when a plan comes together

#24 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,582
  • Reputation: 1,271
  • LocationMatthews, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 02 July 2014 - 01:02 PM

He doesnt need WR money because the bum isn't a WR. He's a TE. When he was drafted, they called him a TE. On the Saints roster it says TE. On Grahams own f'ing personal twitter account it says TIGHT END. He's a TE, the clown just wants a fatter check than the exorbitant amount of money the guy already has. 

 

You realize the team is way more rich than the player right? 

 

Once again, it doesn't matter what MY or YOU opinion is, the rules say he should be paid lol.  Why is this hard?

 

Would he have led the league with 16 TD's if he never lined up as a WR?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users