Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

carolina-chuck

PJ Hairston Appreciation Thread

74 posts in this topic

I don't think PJ was anywhere close to the top 10, was he? I thought he was in the 30s

Sent from my iPhone

ESPN- #13

Rivals- #13

MaxPreps- #22

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ESPN- #13

Rivals- #13

MaxPreps- #22

Hmm...thanks for posting. I didn't remember that at all.

Sent from my iPhone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know he was drafted to be a role player, that's why I said that.

Then you should've also said that yesterday was Saturday too if your goal was just stating the obvious.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined