Point being, your smack is incredibly weak when you're referencing a 'rating' based on a tiny sample size in conditions that are very unlike a real game (1st week of preseason, little to no game planning, mix of starters and depth, reduced intensity, etc.).
I have no doubt that the Saints will be very good this year. I have quite a bit of doubt that 8 carries by Mark Ingram in the 1st preseason game has any bearing on that outcome. I also doubt his fuging PFF "Elusive Rating" means even a quarter poo when it comes to his capabilities as an NFL running back. I could pull a whole boatload of stats pointing to Ingram being a massive waste of a 1st rounder.
Go back to discussing your pre-teen-like obsessive collection of overpriced gelatin-outsole basketball shoes. I'd be much more inclined to take you as an authority on that topic.
Well I guess Jeremy needs to shut the board down since there is only a tiny sample of worthless football played so far that only an asshat would discuss, so nothing to talk about yet.