Pro Bowl
#1
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:06 PM
#2
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:07 PM
#3
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:07 PM
#4
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:08 PM
#5
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:08 PM
#6
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:08 PM
#7
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:08 PM
#8
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:10 PM
also wharton and otah are better than gross but whatever guess he has that name recognition
#9
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:11 PM
lol portis and turner over deangelo what a joke
also wharton and otah are better than gross but whatever guess he has that name recognition
Gross plays a more integral part of the OL however. I personally don't know who else in the NFC to take over him. That's why i thought that one was a bit iffy cause i don't think he's had a pro bowl year.
#10
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:12 PM
Anyway... I wish DeAngelo had made it, but I figured he wouldn't...
I'm just glad Beason made it, he definitely deserves it.
#11
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:13 PM
lol portis and turner over deangelo what a joke
also wharton and otah are better than gross but whatever guess he has that name recognition
Turner I can understand over Dlo..... Portis I don't understand
#12
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:13 PM
MAAAANNNN WTF does D. WIll have to do!?!?! I guess the dudes above him weren't bad backs. Then Again the Panthers have a better record and they often go off of that.
MAN! I'm proud for Pep. (WHERE'S JAKE!!!)... KASAY...and the biggest one who I knew wouldn't make it but should
RHYS LLOYD!!!!
#13
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:14 PM
#14
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:15 PM
Turner I can understand over Dlo..... Portis I don't understand
I don't understand AP over Dlo. 7 less TDs and not that many more yards. Turner and Dwill should be the first 2 IMO.
#15
Posted 16 December 2008 - 04:15 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





