Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Too Dependent Upon Smith?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
58 replies to this topic

#51 SCpanther

SCpanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 369
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 12:18 AM

As long as he doesn't get too crazy throwing it into coverage, I don't see what the problem is. Smith is still the number one weapon in our offense, and as such, he needs to touch the ball as often as possible.

#52 ed bell

ed bell

    Ruthless

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 2,999
  • Reputation: 756
SUPPORTER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 12:30 AM

are you serious?

About what?

#53 Scutty

Scutty

    Huddle Kiwi

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 696
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 12:55 AM

If Jake does show signs of being dependant on Smith then it's at the peril of opposition defences. If D's tighten up/double team Smith stands to reason there will be someone with not quite the same attention being payed to them ergo sooner or later Jake will hit that target instead of his dependant target

#54 Fireball77

Fireball77

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,398
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 01:29 AM

I dont know why we dont get him the ball more. It seems like until the past 2 weeks we've almost completely ditched the quick screen pass to Smitty. We lived and died off that play in 2005 and it got us to the NFC championship game. Now that we have a balanced rushing attack (a very good one at that), we should be slipping this in there more than we do. Luckily we've done this the past couple of weeks and it's gotten a first down almost everytime.

The play was abused in 2005 because they had no run game, THAT was their run game basically. I also believe that it is always an option on any run play when Jake sees the CB playing off Smitty. When you have a great run game you don't have to try to "manufacture" one that way. But I'm not disagreeing that it is fine to use more sometimes.

#55 The Answer

The Answer

    Don't panic, it's organic

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 846
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 02:20 AM

when did Jones get any catches?

#56 hdevonxz

hdevonxz

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,744
  • Reputation: 40
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 08:06 AM

when did Jones get any catches?


Mark Jones? In the first game against Tampa a couple weeks ago he had a big catch.

#57 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,929
  • Reputation: 1,459
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 08:22 AM

Delhomme needs to go through his progressions more. 90$ of the time he is just locked on Smith.


Smith has only caught about 35% of Jake's completions this year, so I think you are exaggerating a bit.

#58 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,072
  • Reputation: 993
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 09:27 AM

I just saw Sunday Jake reading his progressions and making big time passes to Moose and Jarrett. Did you not see the game?

ding ding ding

#59 panthers2u

panthers2u

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 216
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 17 December 2008 - 09:35 AM

We could depend on smith more if our frickin running backs would quit getting so damn many touchdowns.


It's gets old. I want Smith to get more passes but Moose shows up and starts getting some of the action...and Williams and Stewart act like they can't get enough rushing yards...everybody wants in on the action...



:D