Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Matt Foley

Russia tests Obama

44 posts in this topic

if liberals dont take action even when we are attacked why in the hell would you think they would do something just because ships are moving to a certain location? obama wont do anything.

He won't do anything for the gays. He won't do anything for the military. Are you suggesting he's a do-nothing leader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if liberals dont take action even when we are attacked why in the hell would you think they would do something just because ships are moving to a certain location? obama wont do anything.

Yeah, it sucked when the most liberal President we ever had never started up Lend Lease against the wishes of the isolationist crowd (and the US population in general), declared war when we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, etc. What a tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it sucked when the most liberal President we ever had never started up Lend Lease against the wishes of the isolationist crowd (and the US population in general), declared war when we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, etc. What a tool.

You're great at sarcasm. You're not cookinwithcharcoal or anything like that. You, my friend, are cookinwithgas. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama will wait until they have conquered the Southern Half of the US before realizing the Russians might be up to something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama will wait until they have conquered the Southern Half of the US before realizing the Russians might be up to something...

nah he will just wait till they take over georgia...haha get it...georgia...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is going to be interesting to see if Obama takes a hardline approach to our enemies. If he does, man, is that going to piss his base off or what? I'll applaud him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking with your head instead of your dick when dealing with nations with conflicting interests will not piss his supporters off. You are completely clueless if you think that Democrats, as a voting block, think that singing kumbaya will solve the worlds problems. We just also know that blowing up anything we don't like is not such a swift idea either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking with your head instead of your dick when dealing with nations with conflicting interests will not piss his supporters off. You are completely clueless if you think that Democrats, as a voting block, think that singing kumbaya will solve the worlds problems. We just also know that blowing up anything we don't like is not such a swift idea either.

Jimmy Carter

/end thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking with your head instead of your dick when dealing with nations with conflicting interests will not piss his supporters off. You are completely clueless if you think that Democrats, as a voting block, think that singing kumbaya will solve the worlds problems. We just also know that blowing up anything we don't like is not such a swift idea either.

How do dems decide that? What is the criteria? How much talking should take place before action becomes the best option? Should talking continue indefinitely?

I'd also like to add, that even if the voting bloc of the dem party has balls, the rest of the world MAY not believe that's the case. The perception to the rest of the world (even according to your own VP) is that he will be tested due to the possibility that he is weak, and the Dem party is weak. And I'm not really trying to get panties in a wad here...Just believe this is probably the perception among our enemies of the Dem party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their perception of Bush was that he was an idiot that could be drawn into anything if you attacked him. Thus 9/11.

[/Htar retardologic]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites