Was this an INT? Indiana v Michigan
Started by Humble Dew, Sep 28 2009 02:30 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:30 PM
I think it was, it looks like the defensive player rips the ball out before the whistle is blown.
#2
Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:35 PM
I can't tell from those two shots... obviously it was ruled an INT... what's the rule if the both have possession and hit the ground?
#3
Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:37 PM
The ball goes to the offense.
#4
Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:37 PM
The ball goes to the offense.
Hmmmm...
#5
Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:04 PM
#6
Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:08 PM
No it's not a pic, by rule that should be offense ball.
Loved the gum throwing.
Loved the gum throwing.
#7
Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:24 PM
No it's not a pic, by rule that should be offense ball.
Loved the gum throwing.
Well that's not true because it was reviewed and called an INT so it was. Was it right? I think so. And I hate Michigan.
#8
Posted 29 September 2009 - 08:02 AM
I still think it should have gone to the offense. The refs took that game out of Indiana's hands.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





