Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Was this an INT? Indiana v Michigan


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic

#1 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,979
  • Reputation: 9,505
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:30 PM



I think it was, it looks like the defensive player rips the ball out before the whistle is blown.

#2 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,475
  • Reputation: 8,414
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:35 PM

I can't tell from those two shots... obviously it was ruled an INT... what's the rule if the both have possession and hit the ground?

#3 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,979
  • Reputation: 9,505
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:37 PM

The ball goes to the offense.

#4 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,475
  • Reputation: 8,414
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 02:37 PM

The ball goes to the offense.


Hmmmm...

#5 Cpanthers5851

Cpanthers5851

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 01-May 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 353
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:04 PM

heres a closer look at it.

http://mbd.scout.com...=2019&t=4833785

#6 tarheelblue89

tarheelblue89

    More u spend, More u win

  • Joined: 23-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,182
  • Reputation: 2
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:08 PM

No it's not a pic, by rule that should be offense ball.

Loved the gum throwing.

#7 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,979
  • Reputation: 9,505
HUDDLER

Posted 28 September 2009 - 03:24 PM

No it's not a pic, by rule that should be offense ball.

Loved the gum throwing.


Well that's not true because it was reviewed and called an INT so it was. Was it right? I think so. And I hate Michigan.

#8 RockyTopVol

RockyTopVol

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,698
  • Reputation: 157
HUDDLER

Posted 29 September 2009 - 08:02 AM

I still think it should have gone to the offense. The refs took that game out of Indiana's hands.