Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Child Porn Cartoons are illegal, federal appeals court says

29 posts in this topic

Posted

So, does my mom go to jail for taking a couple of pictures of me when I was in the tub with my brother and sister, or running around the yard butt nekkid. Technically, some perv could wack off to it?

To me this is absurd. Jase said it best, there is no victim. Drunkard is also right, where do we draw the line? If I write a short story about the murder of a fictional president or draw a picture of what I think the next terrorist attack could be, isn't that offensive as well? It is disturbing that people will draw these, but I also fantasize about other women and will often talk sh*t with my friends, but I won't cheat on my wife.

There is a big difference between expressing a fantasy and acting on it. Is there a study that proves that 100% of the people that do this are pedos? If so, is there also a study showing that those that enjoy GTA are cop killers and bad drivers? I honestly do not think that 100% of the people looking at the drawings would act on it nor does it imply that they have real child pornography, 100%. I also would not bet money on it either.

Literotica.com is one of the better story sites that I have found in my searches, the large majority of which are fantasy. There are some disturbing stories of incest, rape, torture, and homosexuality; all of them illegal if acts were committed. Yet I would argue that the huge majority of them, 99%, are fantasy and the readers have never participated in similar acts (well, the argument takes a punch in the face on the homosexuality part).

We have let more and more become acceptable, but does that correlate with a more violent society? We are also more concentrated now than what we were 90 years ago, weapons have advanced, there are different drugs, and mindsets are diffent? Can you really say that we are more violent because of A? Can you even say we are more violent period? Wasn't Aristotle that said that the youth of his time were more disrespectful and violent than when he was a youth?

And I actually do think that Franklin would argue that it is not a crime, no matter how disturbing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

FWIW, I seriously doubt Benjamin Franklin would have agreed that stopping people from drawing pictures of children having sex would be restricting liberty.

Well, of course you would! And I still think the statement applies. We're all for restricting adults' freedom as long as we have the convenient excuse that it's for protecting the children. Even though, again, I'll point out, we're just talking about pen and paper and thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There is a big difference between expressing a fantasy and acting on it. Is there a study that proves that 100% of the people that do this are pedos?

I can understand a lot of what you're saying, but you've got a major flaw in your argument here.

Can you honestly come up with a good reason why a non-pedophile would draw or seek to look at drawings of children having sex?

For my part, this is one of those areas where there's little doubt that the people who are taking part in this stuff are scumbags. But you can't be arrested for being a scumbag. Truthfully, you can't even be arrested for being a pedophile, only for acting on it.

(and they do have their "loud and proud" fringe too, believe it or not)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Should a story about an adult male seducing a twelve year old girl be considered acceptable reading as long as it's well written?

Acceptable?

No

Legal?

Yes

I am 100% against any laws that dictate what you can and cannot think and write about. No matter how disgusting they may be. Government cannot keep you from expressing anything you wish to express.

That said, the citizenry of this country does have the right and obligation to let the author know how they feel about it, and to boycott any commercial interest that tries to profit in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can understand a lot of what you're saying, but you've got a major flaw in your argument here.

Can you honestly come up with a good reason why a non-pedophile would draw or seek to look at drawings of children having sex?

Maybe a kid who is 15 drawing out his experience from last night. Was it not Keith Moon who had some on his computer because of "research"? I'm not saying that it is right and healthy for someone to do it, but the same can be said for those seeking images of rape and murder. Romeo and Juliet was about two kids, very horny. The story was full of sexual overtones... does that quailify as disturbing? Yet it is a story that is read in high schools and colleges. When we start to say that you can't draw this or write this, where then do we determine what has gone to far? You already said stuff about kids in skimpy swim suits and underwear, is that acceptable if it is in a K-mart catalogue or if it is drawn by some weird guy? What about pictures parents take of their kids? Is it just as disturbing as some guy/gal drawing out the same picture? What happens in the grey? Even in the original argument of the depiction of sex with a minor, does it mean that the act will be followed through. Playing table top games, I like to have a back story with my characters and I will write a couple of pages, often times writing out important scenerios that might have happened. Currently, I have a character that murdered a father and newborn daughter. I wrote the scene out and it is a very disturbing scene. Yet I never murdered anyone nor have the desire to. The character is a cleric btw.

For my part, this is one of those areas where there's little doubt that the people who are taking part in this stuff are scumbags. But you can't be arrested for being a scumbag. Truthfully, you can't even be arrested for being a pedophile, only for acting on it.

(and they do have their "loud and proud" fringe too, believe it or not)

I honestly don't believe anyone in this thread would say that these people aren't scumbags. You're right, you can't be arrested for being a scumbag, not in this country. You also can't be arrested for your political beliefs or your religious ones, though I'm pretty sure we are going in that direction.

Wasn't there a political party wanting to legalize it in the EU and just last week a judge denied a 9 year old's divorce to a 50 something year old man. You are right, there is a big loud and proud fringe. But they are wanting the actual acts legalized, not fictional drawings or writings.

mens rea is becoming a myth. There was a similar case a couple of years ago where a judge ruled that drawings were not the same as photographs or video. I think it involved computer generated life like images. Regardless, when there is no intent to harm a minor or exploit them, why is it a crime.

Sorry, I rambled big time on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites