rt81's mom
#1
Posted 06 October 2009 - 03:21 PM
can't have anyone posting porn like that.
going to get osme people fired from their jobs with him doing that.
i can imagine that advertisers are going to love that stuff being allowed.
people with less than 100 posts not being allowed to start threads would help crap like that from happening.
#2
Posted 06 October 2009 - 03:29 PM
#3
Posted 06 October 2009 - 03:32 PM
i agree on the post count limit, although i think 25 is sufficient. you'll never fully deter idiotic, duplicated threads. but hopefully 25 would deter those who want to hide their real identity from creating a new username and then posting porn. you'd have to be a serious loser to waste a bunch of time making 25 posts just so #26 could be porn. but then again, it wouldn't surprise me.
#4
Posted 06 October 2009 - 03:34 PM
agree - that and some other turd posting a picture of a dude teabagging some chick today.
i agree on the post count limit, although i think 25 is sufficient. you'll never fully deter idiotic, duplicated threads. but hopefully 25 would deter those who want to hide their real identity from creating a new username and then posting porn. you'd have to be a serious loser to waste a bunch of time making 25 posts just so #26 could be porn. but then again, it wouldn't surprise me.
the teabagger was rt 81 mom also...should have been banned when that was posted...I think the mods are on their lunch break or something
#5
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:03 PM
#6
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:04 PM
#7
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:05 PM
Did someone say porn???
ya u missed the mom son incest porn
#10
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:12 PM
the teabagger was rt 81 mom also...should have been banned when that was posted...I think the mods are on their lunch break or something
They eat? I thought they were robotic monitors that Zod got a deal on.
#11
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:25 PM
#12
Posted 06 October 2009 - 04:37 PM
#13
Posted 06 October 2009 - 05:10 PM
ya u missed the mom son incest porn
That's a good thing I missed................right?
#14
Posted 06 October 2009 - 05:16 PM
that's a good thing i missed................right?
yes!!
#15
Posted 06 October 2009 - 06:59 PM
seriously needs to have that IP address banned.
can't have anyone posting porn like that.
going to get osme people fired from their jobs with him doing that.
i can imagine that advertisers are going to love that stuff being allowed.
people with less than 100 posts not being allowed to start threads would help crap like that from happening.
I will tell you like Jase told me..I think the 100 post thing is a good ideal..but its all about profitability..lol:rolleyes5:
your ease of use is secondary to the site's profitability
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






