Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SZ James (banned)

Inmates who clapped for cop-killer may face reprisals

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

rally.jpg

I wonder are these cops morons? Probably not. Yea, I doubt that poster would call these guys morons.

 

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, 332nd said:

That's why I find this an interesting first amendment case, because I don't recall those cops getting in any trouble.

Well that is a dynamic of power   

 

Its naive to think that does not make a difference  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

get rid of police unions, as well.  no government employee should belong to a union.

Completely disagree. Everyone has the right to representation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

maybe criminals shouldn't taunt police.  maybe police shouldn't taunt criminals.

Peace, Love and Happiness. Makes the world a better place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2018 at 8:38 PM, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

i know. glad we got that cleared up. now please stop filling up my notifications with your stupid posts.

Yes, I'm glad we did clear it up. Makes everything you said to me pretty pointless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Still Brooklyn said:

Yes, I'm glad we did clear it up. Makes everything you said to me pretty pointless.

 

On 2/20/2018 at 8:38 PM, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

please stop filling up my notifications with your stupid posts.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2018 at 4:48 PM, Happy Panther said:

You are the poster child of this neoforum. Angry insults are the baseline. Dumbass and baby brain and dumb bullshit in the span of a few minutes. No discussion.

But I will note that in one breath you rage against me for apparently setting the boundaries of discussion but happily tell another poster to "take it back to the main forum."

Work on the anger.

 

 

On 2/20/2018 at 5:00 PM, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

you purposefully cut out the substance of my post because it made you look like a dumbass and instead you shifted to this whiny tone argument. this all started because you quoted a post of mine wherein i specifically said i do not care about the legality of any proposed punishment in this case just to say "uh well this discussion is about the first amendment!!! what you're talking about is something else!!!" no poo im talking about something else, dipshit. i said as much. now you're mad because i didn't take care to protect your delicate feelings as i called you out over it lol.

you tried to stifle a legitimate conversation. that white noise main forum guy stumbled into this topic to say i sound like westboro baptist church so i told him to get the fug out. there's a clear difference but i wouldn't expect someone like you to get it lol

The irony of a discussion over freedom of speech.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×