Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

We'd be a 15-1 - 13-3 team if we had a D coordinator who isn't a dumbass.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 John Fox

John Fox

    it is what it is

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,257 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:25 PM

Don't give me that Kemo wasn't there bullshit. Good defensive coordinators can adjust to injuries. Take a look at New England, shut down the Cards and their two pro bowl receivers receivers, and Tim Hightower. Look at Seattle, they suck ass, but pretty much everyone on that defense is injured. They held the Jets to 3 points.


The problem to this team is obvious, it's THE TURD.

Is there really any doubt turd is the worst defensive coach in the league? Send his ass to the CFL.

#2 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    We dominated time of possession though!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,304 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:26 PM

Then why don't you fire him coach?

What, has he got pictures of you in assless chaps with a goat or something?

#3 cptx

cptx

    Junkhead

  • ALL-PRO
  • 4,326 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:27 PM

hey, look what I found.

http://www.carolinah...ord-has-go.html

#4 John Fox

John Fox

    it is what it is

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,257 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:35 PM

Then why don't you fire him coach?

What, has he got pictures of you in assless chaps with a goat or something?


I'm pretty sure thats Hurney's job boy. We've got to stick through the season, firing a coordinator in December is just bad.

But, mark my words, the turd will get flushed this off season,

#5 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,264 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:52 PM

Ummm, did you just use Seattle as an example? They have only won 3 games all season and been completely blown out several times. That game for them was the exception to the season. You also can't really use New England as an example either at is clearly the scheme designed by Bellicheck who is responsible for their success year after year.

Whilst good Co-ords can adapt to injuries, not many can adjust to losing your two starting DTs. Look what happened to the Vikes after losing Pat. Pretty similar situation to ours but we lost Lewis in the game as well.

Whilst everyone wants to have a defensive genuis generating defenses like the Steelers or Ravens where they can take the ball away every play the co-ords resonsible for those schemes are few and far between, most of which will get head coaching jobs and thus we would need to get rid of Fox to get one of them. So getting someone brilliant is really quite rare. Oh and using your incredible logic, what the hell happened to the Steelers D? Over 30 points? They must be a terrible D.

Some people really need to grow up

Edited by Urrymonster, 22 December 2008 - 01:55 PM.


#6 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,090 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 01:56 PM

Don't give me that Kemo wasn't there bullsh*t. Good defensive coordinators can adjust to injuries. Take a look at New England, shut down the Cards and their two pro bowl receivers receivers, and Tim Hightower. Look at Seattle, they suck ass, but pretty much everyone on that defense is injured. They held the Jets to 3 points.


The problem to this team is obvious, it's THE TURD.

Is there really any doubt turd is the worst defensive coach in the league? Send his ass to the CFL.


Actually, all teams suffer from injuries. For example with Robbins, Burress and Jacobs out, the Giants lost two of three. When two of those guys come back, then they win. Thats the way things go. Adjustments for one injury are possible, but when you lose two or three at a critical position as we have, that you get situations like last night. And we were not playing the Cards. We were playing the defending superbowl champs.

#7 yars revenge

yars revenge

    Junior Member

  • NEWB
  • Pip
  • 12 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:06 PM

Giants are a better team, nothing else really to say.

#8 Kse50

Kse50

    Member

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:14 PM

Giants are a better team, nothing else really to say.


I wouldn't say that. We put our foot up their ass the first half. Just seemed like our boys stayed in the locker room the whole 2nd.

#9 yars revenge

yars revenge

    Junior Member

  • NEWB
  • Pip
  • 12 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:30 PM

I wouldn't say that. We put our foot up their ass the first half. Just seemed like our boys stayed in the locker room the whole 2nd.


That's our team philosophy though. We play to protect a lead, thus why Smith vanished off the radar and we pretty much only ran the second half, regardless of how many they were stacking the box with. We basically come out of halftime in situations like that saying "just hold on! Only 30 minutes to go!" We play to hold on, not to put the game away.

I think the Giants, by being more confident in all facets of their Offense, are the better team.

Just opinion.

#10 beastson

beastson

    Big Money

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,746 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:39 PM

Like I said last night, fox needs to takeover the defense... AGAIN

#11 Cpt slay a ho

Cpt slay a ho

    Lord Flacko

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,176 posts

Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:41 PM

we never finish a game,that's why some of these teams are able to comeback....i hate that poo


Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com