why wasnt that a fumble?
Posted 28 December 2008 - 10:46 PM
Sure sounded cajun to me.....
Posted 28 December 2008 - 11:07 PM
Posted 28 December 2008 - 11:11 PM
They Hoculied it. I like that verb. Nice. Reminds me of Munson.
it was a fumble...i wasn't even sweating the replay because it was so obvious.
they totally Hoculied that call...
Posted 28 December 2008 - 11:33 PM
Posted 29 December 2008 - 12:09 AM
I didn't get a clear look at the play at wwork but it looked like an obvious fumble to me.
I noticed the refs took a long time reviewing it what was their excuse?
We were jobbed on that one...
And how many times after refs get a call wrong and give the ball back to the other team, that other team marches right down and scored....
Posted 29 December 2008 - 12:10 AM
Posted 29 December 2008 - 12:13 AM
If Marshall coulda hung on to the damn ball it wouldn'ta mattered...
They would have said he didnt have Pos. They tried there best to hand the game to the saints IMO. That black Ref always screws us IDK why but he dose.
Posted 29 December 2008 - 12:23 AM
Posted 29 December 2008 - 12:38 AM
Posted 29 December 2008 - 01:15 AM
Posted 29 December 2008 - 02:51 AM
Yes it's conspiracy crap but I bet that would have stayed a fumble had Brees not been close to Marino's record.
Really it prob just as likely that it was a make up call for calling PI on them in the first. That call was wrong too.
Posted 29 December 2008 - 03:17 AM
Followed shortly by a TERRIBLE ball spot on 3rd down (Screen pass, the saints player hits the ground a yard short, rolls 3 yards and they give them the spot and then some). Most frustrating 10 seconds of officiating this season.
Posted 29 December 2008 - 03:20 AM
They are supposed to have "indisputable evidence" to overturn the call on the field, but there was none, he had complete control of the ball, BS call.
Yep, it truly amazes me how many people, refs and fans, don't understand what indisputable means. Too many calls are overturned on questionable, or in this case, non-existent evidence.