Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Another nail in the coffin of the silly "we can get kids to stop having sex" movement


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#16 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,549 posts

Posted 30 December 2008 - 09:01 PM

You mean "protection" doesn't mean "invincibility talisman?"

#17 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,558 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 30 December 2008 - 09:06 PM

[/retardo conservative Christian logic]

Statements like that take away any credibility you have to complain about anyone else being bigoted or hateful (unless you're comfortable with hypocrisy).

You want to criticize logic, thought process or content, fine. Name calling doesn't strengthen your argument. It makes you sound like people I've heard you be critical of.

Edited by Mr Scot, 30 December 2008 - 09:09 PM.


#18 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 12,549 posts

Posted 30 December 2008 - 09:13 PM

Are there conservative Christians that approve of allowing proper sex education and access to birth contol for teens? Yes.

Do they make up larger than, say, 5% of those who designated themselves as conservative Christians? Hell no.

I guess it's bigoted to say all conservative Christians believe that reanimation is possible and has been for millenia.

Edited by Delhommey, 30 December 2008 - 09:16 PM.


#19 MyDrunkardNC

MyDrunkardNC

    Nervous Farter

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 572 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 12:24 AM

Sex has been around a lot longer than marriage.


Shh, people aren't supposed to spread such common sense when discussing sex education. :frown2:

#20 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,968 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 31 December 2008 - 08:14 AM

Sex has been around a lot longer than marriage.


I am married... what is this sex you speak of?

#21 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,101 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 10:12 AM

It is beyond your understanding. Now get off the couch and take out the trash.

#22 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,076 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 10:27 AM

I am conservative and a Christian, and I have no problem with sex ed.

#23 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,101 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 11:09 AM

Please have a conversation with all the others then, thanks!

#24 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,076 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 11:29 AM

I think that there is a great many young conservatives out there that feel this way. The problem is the Old ones are the ones talking and making the headlines.

#25 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,639 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 10:30 PM

I am conservative and a Christian, and I have no problem with sex ed.



Sex education or sex with ed? :)

#26 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,639 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 10:34 PM

In truth, sexual education in this day and age is useless for most kids. All they did when I took it was give the how to's and the dangers. The Wikipedia article on it will tell more than that.

#27 Htar

Htar

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 01 January 2009 - 12:24 PM

Better than being a complete dumb ass I guess...


I don't know, is it? You're speaking from experience, right?

#28 Htar

Htar

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 01 January 2009 - 12:26 PM

I think sex ed is important, but everything should be taught - even the virtues of abstaining. All the odds of those methods should be taught, too.

#29 Htar

Htar

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 01 January 2009 - 12:28 PM

Statements like that take away any credibility you have to complain about anyone else being bigoted or hateful (unless you're comfortable with hypocrisy).

You want to criticize logic, thought process or content, fine. Name calling doesn't strengthen your argument. It makes you sound like people I've heard you be critical of.


Don't be so hard on him...He believes he's superior to everyone else, so in his mind, he is...The reality is completely different.

#30 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,193 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 01 January 2009 - 05:29 PM

So during the 70's, STD's, uplanned and teenage pregancies were at an all time high.
Not much sex ed going on at the time.

Isn't this classic cause and effect? You have UNPROTECTED sex, the above are what CAN happen. May not, but CAN.
Get the proper protection, you STILL CAN get all the above. Not as likely, but likely.
Abstain from sex, pretty good shot you won't get the above. Pretty simple.
I think the emphasis is on the wrong directive. Teach both paths.
That way the child/teen is informed. And when they want to crank out kids like it's making cookies, knock yourself out.


BTW- Isn't the abstain angle similar to the threat of Global Warming?
There are tangible and not so tangible things on that so(mocking concerned voice) we all need to do our part and "abstain" from using fossil fuels or abstain from styrofoam cups etc.
So lets teach kids NOT to use a car and ride mass transit because he will single handlely alter the course of the Earth due to abstaining from building a carbon footprint.
But not for sex. Roll the dice kid.
The so called educated elite are some of the biggest jackasses around.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com