Saw this on another msg bd, the question being "Is Lions going 0-16 bad for the NFL" ?
Thoughts
8 replies to this topic
#2
2jakefansinva
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 3,532 posts
Senior Member
Posted 29 December 2008 - 09:34 PM
I'd say that 50% of the NFL teams would say NO. Expeciality the 50% that played the Lions. 
#3
Ashor
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 464 posts
Taylor Swift
Posted 30 December 2008 - 02:54 AM
I don't see why it's a bad thing. Wins are never a given in today's NFL.
#4
dsb5309
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 408 posts
Senior Member
- LocationSF
Posted 30 December 2008 - 08:13 PM
The thing that won't be remembered about this 0-16 team is that they had comfortable leads in several of their games and nearly won a bunch too. We went down 17-3 to them during one point in our game.
#5
Doc Holiday
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,794 posts
Huddle Gunslinger
Posted 30 December 2008 - 11:30 PM
with the salary cap no, 0-16 just means that the Lions have been mismanaged to hell, and that's why they are where they are.
#6
House
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,481 posts
Fly Navy
Posted 30 December 2008 - 11:57 PM
Well since Detroit is a ghost town anyways I would say no.
#7
Humble Dew
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 39,371 posts
2 Corinthians 5:14-21
Posted 31 December 2008 - 03:42 AM
Could be worst, I'm sure the NFL hates not having a team in LA more.
#8
Paintballr
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 838 posts
Senior Member
Posted 03 January 2009 - 02:03 AM
Could be worst, I'm sure the NFL hates not having a team in LA more.
Could be worse if one of there "large" market babies went 0-16
#9
2jakefansinva
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 3,532 posts
Senior Member
Posted 03 January 2009 - 12:31 PM
Why is there a team in Detroit anyway?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
