Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Postseason Power Rankings from ESPN


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#16 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,516 posts

Posted 30 December 2008 - 07:34 PM

LOL....so the Chargers and Steelers have a better WR corps than we do? Im not even going to comment on the QB thing, that is just absurd. Also, we should have the #1 rated RB's.


Thank you joemac.

Steve Smith >>>>> Hines Ward >> Vincent Jackson

Moose >> Malcolm Floyd, Limas Sweed, Chris Chambers, Santonio Holmes...

How this math works is beyond me.

And I'd like to go on the record as saying I can't shake this feeling that Jarrett is going to show up in a BIG way this postseason. I don't know why cuz I've never really even much cared for the kid, but I just can't shake the feeling.

You heard it here first.

#17 Pimpdaddy

Pimpdaddy

    takin it as it comes

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,857 posts

Posted 30 December 2008 - 07:45 PM

...FaQ ESPN (extra special penis network)...I dont care what they have to say since my TV hasn't been on that station since 1999 when Prince was the sh!t...I like our players and our intagibles and if Fox would get the h3ll out of the way we'd run away with the Bowl...

#18 beastson

beastson

    Cam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,818 posts

Posted 30 December 2008 - 09:57 PM

Yet they have us with the #2 DBs and #1 ST?


Wow... wow

#19 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,335 posts
  • LocationConcord, NC

Posted 31 December 2008 - 03:01 AM

jake should at least be ranked top 5 in the playoff's.

#20 panthersphan

panthersphan

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,478 posts
  • LocationDenver, CO

Posted 31 December 2008 - 03:50 AM

They probably had to give us overly low rankings in certain categories so that we wouldn't add up to the highest amount, b/c we should, and we all know ESPN would never put us #1...

#21 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,888 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 09:12 AM

Thank you joemac.

Steve Smith >>>>> Hines Ward >> Vincent Jackson

Moose >> Malcolm Floyd, Limas Sweed, Chris Chambers, Santonio Holmes...

How this math works is beyond me.

And I'd like to go on the record as saying I can't shake this feeling that Jarrett is going to show up in a BIG way this postseason. I don't know why cuz I've never really even much cared for the kid, but I just can't shake the feeling.

You heard it here first.



I have a feeling they are talking about a WR core, not singular players. And yes, I would take SD's core over ours, but not any player overf SS.

Jackson, Chambers, Davis, Floyd, Nannee. There is some depth there.

vs. SS, Hack, Jarrett, Moose.

#22 carolinarolls

carolinarolls

    Mel's brother Del

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,264 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 09:50 AM

With the lousy performances Jake had in the middle of the season and the fantastic display of RB play from Dewill and even Stewart it's easy to downgrade Jake to 11. Flacco who has led a team that is usually offensive deficient as a rookie is easily seen as more valuable to most. Collins has had a great year and even though he to works with a great RB tandem, he was forced to win with his arm and prevailed when the Titan run was schemed against and taken away. Chad Pennington has shined all year despite working in an offensively handicapped roster under new..everything.

11 is not that bad. I know you guys do not expect Jake to crack the top ten with plays to Smitty like the one that set up JA KaY last Sunday. Those throws rarely win you many points with these guys.

He did play some great games this season but as is the norm with Jake, there were som real stinkers to accompany them and the winners had some pretty questionable heaves that just plain worked out largely due to one Steve Smith.

I know you guys don't like hearing that but c'mon, take the BDJS blinders off and be happy about Jake being at 11 after a major surgery and a missed season. It's really not that bad.

I'm ecstatic over it!

#23 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,516 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 12:45 PM

They probably had to give us overly low rankings in certain categories so that we wouldn't add up to the highest amount, b/c we should, and we all know ESPN would never put us #1...


Agreed.

#24 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,516 posts

Posted 31 December 2008 - 12:48 PM

I have a feeling they are talking about a WR core, not singular players. And yes, I would take SD's core over ours, but not any player overf SS.

Jackson, Chambers, Davis, Floyd, Nannee. There is some depth there.

vs. SS, Hack, Jarrett, Moose.


That's the point I was trying to make fuzz. Steve Smith is so far superior to every other wideout on San Diego and Pittsburgh that the decent to mediocre talent behind him on the depth chart is offset by him alone, making our WR core better than those. Am I gonna say better than Indy or Arizona? Certainly not. But SD, give me a break...

#25 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,086 posts
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon

Posted 31 December 2008 - 08:21 PM

i could live with #5 for WR. But come on 11 in QB with chad pennington and joe flacco being better? Even Kerry Collins?


Not to mention Ben "I Was Just Sacked AGAIN" Roethlesberger.

What a joke!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.