Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

what kind of DT?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
18 replies to this topic

#16 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,975
  • Reputation: 910
HUDDLER

Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:09 PM

not bad. from the little i seen, he does get pressure on the qb pretty good.corrupts the pocket, but a couple of times he got man-handled by the olinemen.needs to work on getting off a block.but if he is there in the 4th, i would pull the trigger on him. but im no gm, i just play 1 on this website.lol.

#17 scpanther22

scpanther22

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,236
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 08 February 2010 - 10:07 PM

Just the guys you've actually heard of would make you happy


what???

#18 WilkinsonDonnie

WilkinsonDonnie

    Monsanto's = Evil

  • Joined: 27-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 576
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 09 February 2010 - 08:14 PM

Well I guess we worked out Ed Johnson the former DT of the Colts, living in Indiana I dont think very highly of him but wouldnt mind more training camp fodder. Might provide a reason to cut or trade one of the veterans

#19 nagai

nagai

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,207
  • Reputation: 74
HUDDLER

Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:19 AM

Given the choice, I really think we need a 3 technique. Last year we were 23rd in sacks. That's just not acceptable for Fox's and Meek's philosophy. If you guys study the tampa 2 system, it often involves smaller, more athletic linemen (not just DE's, but DT's too) to get pressure on the QB without blitzing. Yeah, that's not what we have right now.