Question about my brother
#1
Posted 15 February 2010 - 04:38 AM
2 weeks later, The United States Secret Service contacted the Hayward Police Department (our cities police department) to come to talk to my brother about a 51/50. For those who don't know, Section 5150 is a section of the California Welfare and Institutions Code which allows a qualified officer or clinician to involuntarily confine a person deemed to have a mental disorder that makes them a danger to him or her self, and/or others and/or gravely disabled.
Now I highlighted involuntarily b/c after the police talked to my brother, they called an ambulance and told him that they had to take him to a psychiatric facility b/c he was a threat to other people. My brother didn't voluntarily go, he was forced against his will. He was taken in and had to stay there 3 days before he was discharged.
About 3 weeks later, we received 4 different bills, one from the ambulatory unit, another from the hospital, and 2 more from the psychiatric facility totaling close to $4000. So I'm confused. If my brother was involuntarily taken in for a 51/50, why should we be billed?? Does anyone know what happens, or if this is right? Any law students out there. Thanks for the help.
#2
Guest_CatofWar_*
Posted 15 February 2010 - 05:09 AM
#3
Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:24 AM
If not...send the people that sent the bill a letter stating that you are not responsible for his costs. If you've got a buddy that's a lawyer...ask him to just draw up a letter for you. I hate bill collectors...some jack-A in Raleigh with the same exact name as I doesn't pay his bills and I get his collection calls. Always gets to the point of them trying to confirm some Soc. Sec numbers and I put them in their place.
#4
Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:55 AM
#5
Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:55 AM
Be careful of what you write to politicians or other public figures.
#7
Posted 15 February 2010 - 06:50 PM
Is your brother "special needs" or just a bit "off"? How old is he?
His medical insurance should have coverage for mental care so you may want to look at filing the bills with them for partial reimbursement.
Also, as for him having to pay for the services, tax payers shouldn't have to foot the bill for his royal screw up, especially since he had been warned before.
#8
Guest_CatofWar_*
Posted 15 February 2010 - 07:07 PM
I asked this before the forum did the space-time continuum leap -
Is your brother "special needs" or just a bit "off"? How old is he?
His medical insurance should have coverage for mental care so you may want to look at filing the bills with them for partial reimbursement.
Also, as for him having to pay for the services, tax payers shouldn't have to foot the bill for his royal screw up, especially since he had been warned before.
Why not? We're paying for a study to get chineese hookers to be able to handle their liquor, so what's $4,000 for a real issue?
#9
Posted 15 February 2010 - 07:08 PM
Go out of your way to go hey we get it, lesson learned, never going to happen again. I agree with the taxpayer not footing it part but the rule traps the person.
Good luck
#10
Posted 15 February 2010 - 07:59 PM
#11
Guest_CatofWar_*
Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:12 PM
telling Obama to order to pull the troops out of Iraq or else he'll die based on his bad karma and his responsibility for the loss of these lives.
Yes it was in poor taste, but he didn't threaten him at all. He said he would die bc of karma. I think the ss sent their errand boys knowing that no crime was committed and got the guy to increminate himself into saying he was suicidal/homicidal.
#12
Posted 15 February 2010 - 08:27 PM
#13
Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:51 PM
I know this is OT, but the more I read the OP, the more I think no crime was even committed. If all he wrote was:
Yes it was in poor taste, but he didn't threaten him at all. He said he would die bc of karma. I think the ss sent their errand boys knowing that no crime was committed and got the guy to increminate himself into saying he was suicidal/homicidal.
If you write a letter to the president that says "you're going to die" you're going to be in deep poo no matter what the context.
#14
Guest_CatofWar_*
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:09 PM
If you write a letter to the president that says "you're going to die" you're going to be in deep poo no matter what the context.
Eh, I don't think as much. He wasn't arrested. All that happened was he incriminated himself enough to be involuntarily committed. Everyone is going to die. Even Big O. I don't think it was that big of a threat, if a threat at all.
#15
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:22 PM
He is partially to blame.
Not sure how the billing should work. Doesn't seem right you got stuck with an involentary bill. You could always scream racial profiling?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






