Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

No long-term offer yet for Matt Moore


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
50 replies to this topic

#25 OneBadassCat

OneBadassCat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,082
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:11 PM

We better get his ass under contract. You seriously can't consider letting him go for any reason or plausible compensation.

#26 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,279
  • Reputation: 5,870
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:14 PM

with the high value put on a QB that can play, who is also still young, i wouldn't even think it's safe to put the highest tender on him

panthers FO should be making a timely effort to lock up moore (and at this point, it probably wouldn't cost a whole lot), but of course they're handling it the way they usually handle things, dormant and lacking any sense of urgency whatsoever.

#27 Kyle82

Kyle82

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,964
  • Reputation: 246
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:04 PM

I've never quite understood any Panthers offseason...and I've pulled for them since the beginning....but Peppers should have already been shown the exit and Moore should have already had a secure job here for many years to come...:rolleyes:

#28 grateflday

grateflday

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,465
  • Reputation: 85
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:48 PM

As much as I do not want Delhomme at QB next season. I might be willing to suffer through it for a first round draft pick.


NO WAY!!!! Escpecially since I will be getting my season tickets bill in April. I would be pissed if I knew the attitude was to throw a season away just for a early draft pick.

#29 Nu Guns

Nu Guns

    Banned

  • Joined: 01-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,241
  • Reputation: 0
Banned

Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:00 PM

set the tag on him.
We dont know if Moore is our future yet.
If he plays well, we offer him a fatty contract.

We def want him back...this would be the cheapest franchise tag ever

#30 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,865
  • Reputation: 4,621
Administrators

Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:54 PM

I would be stunned if anyone in the NFL would give a 2nd round pick for Matt Moore.

#31 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,279
  • Reputation: 5,870
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 11:20 PM

I would be stunned if anyone in the NFL would give a 2nd round pick for Matt Moore.


Cleveland
Jacksonville
Oakland
Washington
The Entire NFC West

those are at least 8 teams that could be in the market for a QB, and a number of them are probably desperate at finding a competent QB to be their ticket to contendership.

Lets compare the prospect of Matt Moore to another team to any first round college prospect. Okay, if the panthers put the first round tender on him, than the cost of acquiring him will only be equal to what you'd have to give up for a rookie that has proven nothing at the pro level, and as far as age is concerned, he'll only have just turned 26 by the time the season starts. Moore never played terrible in a game this last season, and that's with a very weak passing offense. Who did he have that was really a threat besides Smith? A geriatric 2nd option, not one established receiving TE, and Dwayne Jarrett, who only put out a decent effort in the last game of the entire season after Smith broke his arm.

Moore is more of an asset than anybody realizes. If the Panthers FO lets someone else steal him right out of their hands, they deserve all the lack of success that is waiting for them in 2010, and meanwhile, all the loyal fans will have to suffer for yet another failed seasonal campaign where Hunter Cantwell starts week 5 and completes 20% of his passes after Jake Delhomme throws 12 interceptions by the time a defensive end breathes on him and ruptures his trachea, ending his season, and then we'll have the same stupid people on here rationalizing our FO's neglect by bringing up all the good moves they made from 8 years ago that haven't been relevant for a long time.

please, FO, lets not fug up the one good opportunity we've been given at having good QB play for years to come

Edited by Raging Bull, 22 February 2010 - 11:22 PM.


#32 Udogg

Udogg

    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,708
  • Reputation: 1,692
HUDDLER

Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:36 AM

Those are all teams with fairly high draft picks. Most people are going to place their hopes on unproven college QB. If Moore performs this year especially early, their will be a deal in place before the season is up. Sort of like Dallas and Romo. If he stinks then we don't lose a ton of money on "another" QB. Put a first round tender on him to be safe and to give him the warm fuzzy going into the season, let him know if he performs at high level, then contract awaits. That's the smart thing to do.

#33 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,279
  • Reputation: 5,870
HUDDLER

Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:49 AM

Those are all teams with fairly high draft picks. Most people are going to place their hopes on unproven college QB. If Moore performs this year especially early, their will be a deal in place before the season is up. Sort of like Dallas and Romo. If he stinks then we don't lose a ton of money on "another" QB. Put a first round tender on him to be safe and to give him the warm fuzzy going into the season, let him know if he performs at high level, then contract awaits. That's the smart thing to do.


well the problem there would be that he'd require a heftier salary.

Not to mention at least half those teams have been burned placing their hopes on an unproven college QB recently. The fact that they found no success in that risk suggests they might be a bit more conservative in the future.

#34 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,800
  • Reputation: 984
HUDDLER

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:11 AM

There is good and evil in putting a tender on him.

The good is we will be able to match what another team offers him. There by not spending more than we have to keep him.

However, the bad could be some team puts a poison pill into their offer. Kind of like Minnesota did when they too the Offensive linemen from Seattle a couple of years ago. (I cannot recall the linemen name right off hand) Something like he has to be the highest paid QB on the roster which would have course force our hand with Jake.

I do think it is a mistake not to tie him up before the Free Agency starts. I would be aweful if Washington steals him and gives us their #4 pick in the draft and we take Bradford or Clausen and that choice becomes a dud. I think this team can thrive with Matt Moore. If we take Clausen or Bradford we may lose our window to win the Super Bowl. I personally believe we are right at the doorstep with the right QB. I don't think a Rookie will lead us to the promiseland.

Go Panthers

#35 Udogg

Udogg

    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,708
  • Reputation: 1,692
HUDDLER

Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:27 AM

With JP off the books. Don't know how much more of a poison pill you can put in the contract :)

#36 CanadianCat

CanadianCat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 713
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 23 February 2010 - 09:36 AM

I would be stunned if anyone in the NFL would give a 2nd round pick for Matt Moore.


agreed. If teams really valued QBs with NFL experience over rookies, then Cambell would be getting all the attention. That is not happeneing. Player movement is pretty rare anyway in the NFL most team would rather draft players they scouted then hope that a guy that had A FEW GOOD GAMES can fit their system.

I love Moore but guys seriously settle down, IMO he is still unproven. You need at least a season to know exactly what you have.