Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

No long-term offer yet for Matt Moore


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
50 replies to this topic

#21 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 11:29 AM

I don't see why we don't at least give him a 2 or 3 year extension.


That achieves nothing. As if he has a great 2010, he will want a big raise the following year as he will only have a year on his contract. Short term contracts usually end up costing a franchise more for players who 'could' break out. You either get them on a long term rookie deal, or you force them to proove they are worth the big bucks with the RFA tenders.

If you give him a 2 year extension, then you could well be paying him for this year and 2011 which could be a lockout. Which in turn means you might as well ahve saved some money by just tendering him.

The RFA tender is probably the best situation for all involved. Please just accept that.

#22 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,639
  • Reputation: 1,226
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 12:15 PM

They will tender him. Really its a smart move if you ask me. If he dose well next year he will get payed. If we use Jake then Fox will be gone and he will get payed.

#23 PantherDude

PantherDude

    Best of luck, Coach Fox!

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,373
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 02:22 PM

Moore will be back next season for sure. I think the front office want to see how he play a full season before he is offer a long-term contract. It best to give him that when he play a full season first.

#24 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,800
  • Reputation: 845
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:06 PM

I'm guessing an RFA tender is a one year deal.

So, if we tender him, we can get him for a year, or get a first and another third. Sounds good either way. And cheap, too.

After Moore wins us the SB next season, they will sign him to a long term deal after the lockout.

This sounds good.

#25 OneBadassCat

OneBadassCat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,082
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:11 PM

We better get his ass under contract. You seriously can't consider letting him go for any reason or plausible compensation.

#26 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,941
  • Reputation: 5,484
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:14 PM

with the high value put on a QB that can play, who is also still young, i wouldn't even think it's safe to put the highest tender on him

panthers FO should be making a timely effort to lock up moore (and at this point, it probably wouldn't cost a whole lot), but of course they're handling it the way they usually handle things, dormant and lacking any sense of urgency whatsoever.

#27 Kyle82

Kyle82

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,951
  • Reputation: 238
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:04 PM

I've never quite understood any Panthers offseason...and I've pulled for them since the beginning....but Peppers should have already been shown the exit and Moore should have already had a secure job here for many years to come...:rolleyes:

#28 grateflday

grateflday

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,459
  • Reputation: 82
HUDDLER

Posted 22 February 2010 - 08:48 PM

As much as I do not want Delhomme at QB next season. I might be willing to suffer through it for a first round draft pick.


NO WAY!!!! Escpecially since I will be getting my season tickets bill in April. I would be pissed if I knew the attitude was to throw a season away just for a early draft pick.

#29 Nu Guns

Nu Guns

    Banned

  • Joined: 01-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,241
  • Reputation: 0
Banned

Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:00 PM

set the tag on him.
We dont know if Moore is our future yet.
If he plays well, we offer him a fatty contract.

We def want him back...this would be the cheapest franchise tag ever

#30 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,702
  • Reputation: 4,443
Administrators

Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:54 PM

I would be stunned if anyone in the NFL would give a 2nd round pick for Matt Moore.