http://www.the-dispa.../1003?p=2&tc=pgI still feel I have some football left and I want to give it a shot if a team will give me the opportunity,” Hoover said. “I’d still like to be there but with the changes they made, it looks like they’re putting themselves in a good opportunity for failure.”
If I had been playing bad or Tony had been playing better than I did, I’d understand it a little more. But that wasn’t the case. I think it was a financial decision for the Panthers.”
“From what everybody’s been telling me, they’re not going to make any moves until after the draft,”
Hoover: Panthers in 'opportunity to fail'
#1
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:03 AM
#2
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:04 AM
#3
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:05 AM
#4
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:07 AM
#5
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:09 AM
A bit of sour grapes, but who can blame him.
Agreed.
He is unemployed and is bitter about it. However, I do think this one was a financial move. You invested a high pick in the best FB in the draft. You have to get those guys on the field. Hoover has struggled with injuries the past two years....including his back.
#6
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:09 AM
#7
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:26 AM
I agree with most of the cuts, but cutting him was a huge mistake. Can't really blame him for any anger he has.
I didn't see it as a huge mistake. Not a endearing move, especially from the fans view point. He is seeing an increasing amount on injuries in the later years of his career playing a position that wears on a player
#9
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:43 AM
#10
Posted 30 March 2010 - 08:46 AM
hate to see him go, he was the best guy for the job based on last season. lets hope fiametta takes the challenge seriously
#11
Posted 30 March 2010 - 09:24 AM
an interesting thing to see would be if fiametta gets hurt and hoover hasn't signed with anyone, would he be willing to make a deal with us or would he be insulted so badly that he wouldn't...
#12
Posted 30 March 2010 - 09:29 AM
agreed.A bit of sour grapes, but who can blame him.
tough decision to make but in the long run it was the best for the club.
time to move on. i'm sure hoover will move on as well. probably will sign with the saints and get hurt and retire. i don't really care, though.
#13
Posted 30 March 2010 - 09:32 AM
#14
Posted 30 March 2010 - 09:42 AM
#15
Posted 30 March 2010 - 09:48 AM
Agreed.
He is unemployed and is bitter about it. However, I do think this one was a financial move. You invested a high pick in the best FB in the draft. You have to get those guys on the field. Hoover has struggled with injuries the past two years....including his back.
Of course it was a financial move Hoover was extremely overpaid and he NEEDED to be cut. I never liked him,he is a very whiny person. Its not about playing better than Hoover its about being comparable at a third of the price, its about being efficient. Cutting Hoover is a great move. As said, they probably offered him a more than fair contract for what he was worth considering his history and age.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






