Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Rank the Panthers Top 3 Needs

Started by Kurb, Apr 07 2010 06:27 PM

Next

Please log in to reply

24 replies to this topic

Poll: Vote for 3 (216 member(s) have cast votes)

Vote for 3

QB (22 votes [10.19%])
Percentage of vote: 10.19%
WR (72 votes [33.33%])
Percentage of vote: 33.33%
G (4 votes [1.85%])
Percentage of vote: 1.85%
T (1 votes [0.46%])
Percentage of vote: 0.46%
DT (50 votes [23.15%])
Percentage of vote: 23.15%
DE (31 votes [14.35%])
Percentage of vote: 14.35%
LB (19 votes [8.80%])
Percentage of vote: 8.80%
CB (7 votes [3.24%])
Percentage of vote: 3.24%
ST Specialist (10 votes [4.63%])
Percentage of vote: 4.63%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Kurb

Uncle Luke...Forever...

Administrators
11,483 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 06:27 PM

Vote :willy_nilly:

Omitted
RB
S
TE
P
K

as I don't consider them need positions.

Edited by Kurb, 07 April 2010 - 06:29 PM.

Back to top

#2 House

Fly Navy

HUDDLER
2,481 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 08:15 PM

Its a good thing you stickied this.

Back to top

#3 CarolinaPanthers8789

Alexander SEMIN!!! FTW

HUDDLER
14,436 posts

LocationNorth Carolina/Virginia

Posted 07 April 2010 - 08:26 PM

Its a good thing you stickied this.

Why omit safety? We could use a back-up Strong Safety.

Back to top

#4 Metal_Sparty

Senior Member

HUDDLER
385 posts

Posted 07 April 2010 - 09:19 PM

Outside of WR I didn't really know what to pic due to most of htem really just needing depth or alternative answers/competition. So I went with QB and LB.

Back to top

#5 RedMage138

YES!YES!YES!

HUDDLER
2,494 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 10:05 AM

WR
DT
SLB

in that order.

DE is up in the air, we could use some o-line depth but I don't consider it a huge need and we only need to be in the market for a backup QB, preferably a vet or UDFA that we can sign for cheap.

Back to top

#6 Samuel L. Jackson

Banned

Banned
7,407 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 10:12 AM

LB
WR
QB

(with DT and DE in a dead heat for the 4th position)

Back to top

#7 chris999

Senior Member

HUDDLER
4,586 posts

LocationFlorida

Posted 08 April 2010 - 01:59 PM

WR, DT and special teams. i know alot of people probably picked LB over special teams, but connor or anderson will be serviceable at LB, but we definately need a ST returner, and a gunner, or two.

Back to top

#8 Panthro

Bunned

Moderators
19,559 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 02:01 PM

Can I vote twice for WR?

Back to top

#9 Sloth

idk

HUDDLER
2,223 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 02:03 PM

Wr, qb, st

Back to top

#10 Samuel L. Jackson

Banned

Banned
7,407 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 02:07 PM

I still don't understand how, with 3 required starters and 4 guys to fill those postions, LB is not a higher need on anyone's list...

I guess if you're comfortable with Mortty Ivy, Jordan Senn, Brett Warren, and Quinton Culberson, more power to you...

Back to top

#11 chris999

Senior Member

HUDDLER
4,586 posts

LocationFlorida

Posted 08 April 2010 - 02:41 PM

I still don't understand how, with 3 required starters and 4 guys to fill those postions, LB is not a higher need on anyone's list...

I guess if you're comfortable with Mortty Ivy, Jordan Senn, Brett Warren, and Quinton Culberson, more power to you...

a good point. i was just considering the starters at wr dt and special teams. we do definately need back-ups at the lb position too. and honestly, i like connor, but i think he would be out of position on the outside.

Back to top

#12 Sloth

idk

HUDDLER
2,223 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 02:44 PM

I still don't understand how, with 3 required starters and 4 guys to fill those postions, LB is not a higher need on anyone's list...

I guess if you're comfortable with Mortty Ivy, Jordan Senn, Brett Warren, and Quinton Culberson, more power to you...

Because Davis, Beason, Conner, Anderson, Whoever as a LB core is better than:

Nothing at all for a returner
Hunter Cantwell as #2 QB
Dewayne Jarrett as anything

I could argue DT as more of a need as well. One LB is coming off IR, three DTs are. Also, not one of those DTs were anything special before getting hurt, unlike the LB.

Not trying to sound like an ass, just defending my list

Back to top

#13 Cracka McNasty

WWNPHD?

HUDDLER
3,069 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 03:08 PM

Wr, qb, st

what I chose. our young QB needs as much help as he can get, and a good receiver can only help him.

Back to top

#14 Samuel L. Jackson

Banned

Banned
7,407 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 03:16 PM

Because Davis, Beason, Conner, Anderson, Whoever as a LB core is better than:

Nothing at all for a returner
Hunter Cantwell as #2 QB
Dewayne Jarrett as anything

I could argue DT as more of a need as well. One LB is coming off IR, three DTs are. Also, not one of those DTs were anything special before getting hurt, unlike the LB.

Not trying to sound like an ass, just defending my list

Returner, we have Sutton and Munnerlyn if we have to have them, and we can pickup someone like Brandon Banks really really late in the draft... It isn't a need...

Get Jason Campbell somehow and the QB need disappears... If we don't, I agree that by my formula, QB is technically the 2nd overall need...

Jarrett will do just fine, in my opinion... He and Moore have worked together longer than Moore and Smitty... But WR is the third biggest need, as we need another smaller/speedy guy to play the slot (unless we want to feature two speedy guys on the outside and put our possession WR (Jarrett) in the slot)... Everyone keeps forgetting Kenny Moore too, and he'll be a solid #4...

DT is nowhere near the need that LB, QB, or WR are... We have two guys we traded draft picks for (Leonard and Tyler), a guy we spent a relatively high draft pick on last year (Irvin), and someone who filled the role more adequately than James Anderson or Dan Connor filled the LB roles (Hayden)...not even mentioning Ed Johnson, who could very well surprise some of you in his rotational role... We have a logjam at DT with no standout star... Sure, we'll draft one pretty early, but I wouldn't consider it in our 3 biggest needs...