So am I the only one
#1
Posted 10 April 2010 - 11:52 AM
Reasons:
1) Everybody is pretty much set on us selecting a WR, which history has proved that Fox and Hurney sometimes go the other direction... (I.E. Selecting Beason when everybody thought that a safety was our biggest need)
2) The WR class is pretty deep this year, we could easily find a quality receiver in the 3rd or 4th round.
3) Despite how people feel about Jarrett and Moore, it isn't like we don't have depth at receiver, will any make opening day roster? I don't know but while I do expect us to draft a receiver, do we actually know if Fox and Hurney have the same sentiments as we do?
I just don't know, drafts can be pretty tricky and I really hope you guys are prepared if we don't select a WR with their 2nd round pick.
#2
Posted 10 April 2010 - 12:51 PM
#3
Posted 10 April 2010 - 01:09 PM
#5
Posted 10 April 2010 - 03:11 PM
#6
Posted 10 April 2010 - 04:46 PM
I might be completely wrong, but I'm feeling DE to be honest. But it really will depend on what's there.
The only thing I would be disappointed by would be S, OL, or RB.
If we draft Dunlap things will be thrown.
#7
Posted 10 April 2010 - 04:50 PM
If we draft Dunlap things will be thrown.
No doubt but I think there is litle chance of that. I doubt he makes to our pick and even if he did I hope our FO is smarter then that. I would say the same about all the Cam Thomas talk.
#9
Posted 10 April 2010 - 05:14 PM
#10
Posted 10 April 2010 - 05:25 PM
So that my love is clear...
*hops on bandwagon*
#11
Posted 11 April 2010 - 01:56 AM
48 is an akward place, I hate making mock drafts with 48. 2nd is the hardest pick because the value sucks.
If all the talent goes off the board then I would want to trade down to the bottom 2nd.
#12
Posted 11 April 2010 - 08:29 AM
I think we will pick WR simply because of BPA.
48 is an akward place, I hate making mock drafts with 48. 2nd is the hardest pick because the value sucks.
If all the talent goes off the board then I would want to trade down to the bottom 2nd.
You must be joking, 2nd picks are were you get value. Guys like Brian Price or D. Thomas are 1st round talents that could fall into the 2nd where they will be had cheaper. There are always guys with great talent that fall into the 2nd this year is even more deep there.
Also I don't think WR will be BPA at 48. Most likely D. Williams (who I don't want anyway lets not tempt fate), G. Tate, A. Benn, and D. Thomas will all be gone. I don't want anything to do with Lafell and Gilyard to me isn't worth that pick (I think he has 3rd round value) but I would be OK with him there if there set on a WR.
Most likely we will draft a DE or DT unless we trade up or one of those guys falls.
#13
Posted 12 April 2010 - 08:09 AM
You must be joking, 2nd picks are were you get value. Guys like Brian Price or D. Thomas are 1st round talents that could fall into the 2nd where they will be had cheaper. There are always guys with great talent that fall into the 2nd this year is even more deep there.
Also I don't think WR will be BPA at 48. Most likely D. Williams (who I don't want anyway lets not tempt fate), G. Tate, A. Benn, and D. Thomas will all be gone. I don't want anything to do with Lafell and Gilyard to me isn't worth that pick (I think he has 3rd round value) but I would be OK with him there if there set on a WR.
Most likely we will draft a DE or DT unless we trade up or one of those guys falls.
Agree completely! I don't think any WR left would BPA at #48 and probably would not be a starter here next year. I hadn't thought about CB, but it could be a possibility at #48 if the right things fall into place.
#14
Posted 12 April 2010 - 01:08 PM
Also GBN, one the more respected draft sites, just revised their big board and have Mardy Gilyard ranked in the low 90's now. Would love to use our 3rd on him just not our 2nd.
#15
Posted 12 April 2010 - 01:13 PM
Still, LB is our biggest need, but our draft position will dictate the way we address our needs...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






