Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

How to sign your core group and take advantage of the uncapped year


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
80 replies to this topic

#76 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,741
  • Reputation: 2,427
Moderators

Posted 16 April 2010 - 03:54 PM

Marshall's contract still has to comply. They haven't published the details but I bet you'll find base salaries about 30% up from his 2 million (or so) salary last year. It's going to be loaded with some guaranteed Roster bonuses etc., that can be converted for cap savings if we get one back.


Looking at it you are correct as it was an extension and not a new contract.

#77 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,540
  • Reputation: 2,258
HUDDLER

Posted 16 April 2010 - 05:06 PM

Looking at it you are correct as it was an extension and not a new contract.


That was one of my questions. With Davis working under the tender if he is given a long term contract does he have to follow the 30% rule. SF says yes. What do you think??

#78 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,741
  • Reputation: 2,427
Moderators

Posted 16 April 2010 - 05:13 PM

I think with a new contract it wouldn't matter so long as the contract doesn't increase 30% in any one given year. The rule is that the contract can't increase more than 30% WITHIN the contract, thus presenting problems with extensions of rookie contracts.

Demeco Ryans was signed for a new contract which included $7 million in salary for 2010, which is certainly more than 30% of his 2009 salary as he was a second round pick originally. I think this is allowed as it is not the same contract so the slate is wiped clean.

The same rules would apply with Davis if offered a brand new contract.

#79 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,261
  • Reputation: 1,061
HUDDLER

Posted 19 April 2010 - 01:31 PM

"12:47

[Comment From Sam JacksonSam Jackson: ]
Any word on DWill getting an extension of some sort, or are we going to roll the dice with the whole CBA situation up in the air?
Monday April 19, 2010 12:47 Sam Jackson
12:48

Charles Chandler:
Their hands are tied because of new CBA rules this year. They'll have to wait until after the season.


Read more: http://www.heraldonl...l#ixzz0lZWL1b9M"

So it evidently isn't as cut and dry as you think. There are issues preventing them from getting these contract extensions that everyone (including the Panthers FO) done.

#80 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,540
  • Reputation: 2,258
HUDDLER

Posted 19 April 2010 - 02:23 PM

"12:47

[Comment From Sam JacksonSam Jackson: ]
Any word on DWill getting an extension of some sort, or are we going to roll the dice with the whole CBA situation up in the air?
Monday April 19, 2010 12:47 Sam Jackson
12:48

Charles Chandler:
Their hands are tied because of new CBA rules this year. They'll have to wait until after the season.


Read more: http://www.heraldonl...l#ixzz0lZWL1b9M"

So it evidently isn't as cut and dry as you think. There are issues preventing them from getting these contract extensions that everyone (including the Panthers FO) done.


The issue is the 30% rule as far as an extension. Once his contract expires it won't be an extension and the 30% rules doesn't apply. At least that is what I think I learned in all these posts???????:thumbsup:

#81 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,261
  • Reputation: 1,061
HUDDLER

Posted 19 April 2010 - 04:54 PM

I didn't read the entire thread. Just was passing along something I read today, that I thought was interesting.