Matt Jones had 65 receptions for 761 yards and 2 tds. Oh yeah he only played 12 games....
Moose had 53 receptions for 581 yards and 1 td.
What is a good WR mean to you, because Matt Jones was 180 yards and a td in 4 fewer games better than the Panthers #2 WR?
Matt Jones-65 Rec., 761 yards, 2 Tds
Keary Colbert-47 Rec., 754 yards, 5 TDs
For a 1st rounder, I really wouldn't call that good production after 4 years in the league.
Using WR stats for our team last year is useless because we had Delhomme throwing the ball. Also, Moose was clearly over the hill last year. Was Matt Jones better than Moose last year? Probably. But, both weren't good WRs anyway.
If we can get a #2 that put up decent numbers like Moose did in 08, then I would qualify that as a good WR.