Forgot your password?
Or sign in with one of these services
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Pumpkin King, 24 Apr 2010
Posted 24 Apr 2010
· Report post
What say you?
It's real hard to evaluate this draft. A lot of these guys have amazing upside, but they are risky.
as in to many Db's and qb's, this draft was good for 2 wr's a DE, and a OLB and that was it
Possibility for D+ with undrafted signings
I'm giving them an A simply for not taking 10 safe picks this year.
I give it a solid B.
Better than last year and with a lot more potential to boot.
I give it a B+ and not a A only because of all the CBs we drafted. If it turns out Marshall really wont be with us this year, then an A because they filled the need.
Anyone voting for a D or F have no f**king clue what they are talking about.
Based on needs/value at this moment I'd have to say: B to B+.
By having even a fraction of these guy's work out in the future (Clausen, LaFell, Edwards, Norwood, Gettis, Pike), I'd have to revise that and give it a possible A.
would be an A if we wouldnt of traded our 2nd next year...B
they get a D for taking pike over jarret brown , trading for armanti edwards .. and taking 2 corners ive never heard of in a row and a SLOW reciever from baylor who RUNS AWAY from contact.. Kyle Williams was still on the board!!!!! .. had they not gotten eric norwood theyd get an F
NEED MORE RAIN GAMES!!!!!!
OK, I'm commenting here... and adding it as my Profile picture...
Existing user? Sign In