Moving up to get Armanti Edwards?
#1
Posted 24 April 2010 - 09:50 PM
#2
Posted 24 April 2010 - 09:51 PM
#3
Posted 24 April 2010 - 09:55 PM
#4
Posted 24 April 2010 - 09:57 PM
#5
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:00 PM
You give up a 2nd round pick for a guy with no position? What exactly do you do with Edwards?
#7
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:01 PM
#8
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:01 PM
You give up a 2nd round pick for a guy with no position? What exactly do you do with Edwards?
Remember all those "Sign Vick" or "Draft The Golden Calf of Bristol" threads? Remember how Davidson will throw out some useless experimental "Mildcat" play when we really need some production instead of a "hope to hell this works" situation?
Say hello to Armanti Edwards. Younger than Vick, more talented than The Golden Calf of Bristol, and makes all those "WTF?" plays suddenly something worth looking at. Probably a reach by trading away a future second rounder, but the upside is there.
If nothing else, we should all be sh*tfaced with joy because we suddenly have an answer for anyone who wants us to get a The Golden Calf of Bristol/Vick style player.
#9
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:02 PM
The same board that was clambering for us to use our second on Pat White last year is now angry that we used a second on a player that's better than Pat White.
I never wanted Pat White.
#10
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:03 PM
Even if we don't get the 2nd back, I think a lot of people are going to act like this conversation never happened over the next few years as they are enjoying the view from Armanti's jock.
And I'm not an App St. guy.
#11
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:07 PM
#12
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:11 PM
#13
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:36 PM
#14
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:43 PM
my thoughts exactly. Edwards is a straight up athlete, we could put him in so many positions, he seems like a good pick with a lot of flexibility and upside
not to mention ST was a big need for us. Always has been, he might be the answer.
#15
Posted 24 April 2010 - 10:49 PM
The same board that was clambering for us to use our second on Pat White last year is now angry that we used a second on a player that's better than Pat White.
The same board where a few days ago I got blasted because I did not want the team to trade future draft picks because I was informed multiple times that.....
Draft picks don't matter next year because the draft class is weak!! Everybody declared this year and we also have the CBA agreement to worry about...
I hope none of those people are the angry one's on this board about giving up a #2 for him.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






