Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Prediction: Jimmy Clawesome starts week 1


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
55 replies to this topic

#46 KatsAzz

KatsAzz

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,042
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 03:18 PM

To think the Panthers would start the season with a rookie with no expierence QB over Matt Moore who has been playing lights out is laughable.

#47 neverlosethefeeling

neverlosethefeeling

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,408
  • Reputation: 582
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 03:34 PM

Would you prefer Jimmy Cl"awesome"??


How's about Jimmy or Clausen or Jimmy Clausen

#48 KARASMATIC444

KARASMATIC444

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 918
  • Reputation: 233
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 03:52 PM

Panthers have publically stated that Moore is the starter. JC will have to unseat him, which is doubtful by opening day.


This, unless Moore gets hurt in training camp he will get the start. i would imagine it would take atleast 4 or 5 weeks of poor playing to get him pulled. but im not sure it depends on how bad he played. i hope he plays well personally, there is nothing better in football to me than having a high quality QB setting behind a guy playing so good you cant pull him. that is a luxury we have never seen and i would love to see it.

#49 Jackson 5

Jackson 5

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 23-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 205
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 05:24 PM

Now week 1, but soon!

#50 Jackson 5

Jackson 5

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 23-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 205
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 05:24 PM

Not week 1, but soon!


Sorry typo and it won't let me edit.

#51 eViL jEsTeR

eViL jEsTeR

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 864
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 06:21 PM

im going on evil jester, did you not see matt's 300yards 21/33 3TDS 0int and a QB rating of 123.2? What more do you want? C mon' man where you drunk off your ass or something?


I saw and am glad he did well. but he's not the future of the franchise. Ryan did well and led his team to the playoffs.

Why wait? Why sit him for 2 or 3 years? He's familiar with the system so he's 70% ahead of the game. The rest he will pick up in training camp and preseason. I honestly feel he'll be 90% as good as Moore by week one, and if allowed to start, would be better than Moore by week 3 or 4. Then, next year, he'll be lightyears ahead of Moore. But if we sit him a year, then that's a years worth of on the field training and experience lost. How many more years will we have smitty? Double Trouble together? We're currently 2 or 3 players away from a superbowl. One of those players is a franchise QB. I have no faith in Moore taking us to the superbowl.

(by the way, last year I used an "anti" jake username like you. actually created it the week after the Arizona loss the year before but created this new one now that he's finally gone!)

#52 SmootsDaddy89

SmootsDaddy89

    Just Say No To Boo

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 10,415
  • Reputation: 973
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 06:33 PM

Starting a rookie QB is a bad idea.


Unless you have an elite receiver, two elite backs, a mammoth offensive line, and a top 10 defense from last year.

If we think Clausen is our guy, why not start him now? He doesn't benefit from NOT playing. If this is a rebuilding year, go ahead and let Jimmy get his growing pains out this season rather than next.

#53 jakesthemistake

jakesthemistake

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 385
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 06:44 PM

I saw and am glad he did well. but he's not the future of the franchise. Ryan did well and led his team to the playoffs.

Why wait? Why sit him for 2 or 3 years? He's familiar with the system so he's 70% ahead of the game. The rest he will pick up in training camp and preseason. I honestly feel he'll be 90% as good as Moore by week one, and if allowed to start, would be better than Moore by week 3 or 4. Then, next year, he'll be lightyears ahead of Moore. But if we sit him a year, then that's a years worth of on the field training and experience lost. How many more years will we have smitty? Double Trouble together? We're currently 2 or 3 players away from a superbowl. One of those players is a franchise QB. I have no faith in Moore taking us to the superbowl.

(by the way, last year I used an "anti" jake username like you. actually created it the week after the Arizona loss the year before but created this new one now that he's finally gone!)


Why is matt not the future of the franchise? What has he done wrong to make you think this? Because he looked as good as any one would out there. How much better could he have done? If we would have put matt in after the bills game we could have made it to the playoffs!
http://www.nfl.com/p...le?id=MOO551757
I think you need to go look at his stats from last year and some of those highlights too you must have forgotten. Dont get me wrong if matt fails jimmy is going to be the perfect person to come in but after matt did that damn good it would be ignorant and foolish to not give him a chance

#54 mj4life

mj4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 944
  • Reputation: 28
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 06:46 PM

matt moore is a great "game manager", when things go right he can get the job done. the question is can he put the team on his back when needed and win games, can he get us come from behind victories, right now we don't have answers to these and we need come to the realization that clausen is more talented than moore.

#55 mj4life

mj4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 944
  • Reputation: 28
HUDDLER

Posted 27 April 2010 - 06:51 PM

Why is matt not the future of the franchise? What has he done wrong to make you think this? Because he looked as good as any one would out there. How much better could he have done? If we would have put matt in after the bills game we could have made it to the playoffs!
http://www.nfl.com/p...le?id=MOO551757
I think you need to go look at his stats from last year and some of those highlights too you must have forgotten. Dont get me wrong if matt fails jimmy is going to be the perfect person to come in but after matt did that damn good it would be ignorant and foolish to not give him a chance


it's more than stats and moore will get his chance to start, i mean they are paying him close to 4 million dollars GURANTEED so it's not like he doing to bad. he also may have a future starting somewhere just not here IMO

#56 eViL jEsTeR

eViL jEsTeR

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 864
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2010 - 07:16 PM

:biggrinjester: