Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

CBO: Health Care Bill Will Cost $115 Billion More Than Previously Assessed


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
13 replies to this topic

#1 Jangler

Jangler

    event horizon of chaos

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 48,068 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 05:55 PM



http://blogs.abcnews...y-assessed.html

The director of the Congressional Budget Office said Tuesday that the health care reform legislation would cost, over the next ten years, $115 billion more than previously thought, bringing the total cost to more than $1 trillion.

The revised figure is due to estimated costs to federal agencies to implement the new health care reform bill – such as administrative expenses for the Internal Revenue Services and the Department of Health and Human Services -- and the costs for a "variety of grant and other program spending for which specified funding levels for one or more years are provided in the act."

CBO had originally estimated that the health care reform bill would result in a net reduction in federal deficits of $143 billion from 2010-2019; this revised number would eliminate most of that savings.


I wonder what the number will be in June? July? 2011? 2012? 2013...

#2 ChucktownK

ChucktownK

    Gitmo Nation Detainee

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,043 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 06:01 PM

Can we sticky the O.G. health care bill thread. It's gonna be epic when this sh!t gets repealed. People are already reporting losses.

#3 MurkN

MurkN

    Simple And Plain

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,004 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 06:19 PM

It'll be alright the fed can just print some more money, no worries.

#4 SmootsDaddy89

SmootsDaddy89

    Just Say No To Boo

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,363 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 06:24 PM



#5 Jangler

Jangler

    event horizon of chaos

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 48,068 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 06:29 PM

It'll be alright the fed can just print some more money, no worries.


Oh yeah....I forgot. N/M

#6 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,764 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:08 PM


You are an ignorant Obama sheep to ignore this. We are only a few months removed from this healthcare overhaul bullsh*t vote and already the CBO is saying "Oops, we missed again."

Obama and his policies are going to ruin the country.

#7 ChucktownK

ChucktownK

    Gitmo Nation Detainee

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,043 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:14 PM


Pretty much how I pictured you.

#8 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,764 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:18 PM

Obama + Democrat lead Senate and Congress = worst government EVER

#9 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,572 posts

Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:48 PM

It will be waaaay more than 115 billion. We all know this. Only the simple minded would believe it would save money. The rabid libs on this board knew it wouldn't save money, but they do not care. It acheives their goal. Whatever you have to say to get there. The end truly justifies any means.

#10 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,841 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 06:36 AM

Office of Management and Budget spokesman Kenneth Baer said in response that the health care law "will reduce the deficit by more than $100 billion in the first decade, and that will not change unless Congress acts to change it. If these authorizations are funded, they must be offset somewhere else in the discretionary budget. The President has called for a non-security discretionary spending freeze, and he will enforce that with his veto pen."

Baer also pointed a reporter to comments made by OMB director Peter Orszag on his blog in March in which the budget director says that Congress has the power to pay for the $115 billion costs with cuts elsewhere, or not act on those budget authorizations in the bill at all.


yep

#11 Planiversal

Planiversal

    Gigantic Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 08:30 AM

CBO also didn't factor in that for businesses it would make fiscal sense to pay the penalty and let their employees enter the exchange... using the money they save to give pay raises which will more than cover the subsidized exchange rate for 95% of their employees and thus not causing conflict with the unions. Ask at&t, john deere, cat... etc. The sad thing is, if and when this bill finally gets repealed and called a failure - there will be no true incentive for the companies to go back to what it was a year ago and splitting healthcare costs with their employees pretty much across the entire labor-board... they will see opportunity and leave it at what will then be the status quo, that of the employees finding their own providers and paying in full (only no longer subsidized). fun for everyone! although.. don't really see that happening, now that its implemented - there is no going back for pretty much that exact reason.

#12 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 17,498 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 08:33 AM

Come on guys. It's only 115 billion more. That's only like 1600 dollars per family.

#13 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,585 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 09:27 AM

yep


You actually think that Obama and Crew will not enact those pieces...thus not increasing the spend? If you answer yes, you are as fuging dillusional as we all think.

You got what you wanted....subsidized healthcare. And, you don't care the cost....because you are not the one paying for it.

They could resolve this....but we all know they won't.

#14 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,266 posts

Posted 13 May 2010 - 09:55 AM

Obama + Democrat lead Senate and Congress = worst government EVER

If the Right hadn't gotten so damned rabid as of late I would be hoping for a Repub sweep in the mid terms. Something about a liberal in the White House and a conservative congress that appeals to me. Unfortunately I fear that in the current climate there is very little room for bipartisanship and little good would come out of that sweep Id like to see.


Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com