Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Mr. Witherspoon


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
20 replies to this topic

#16 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,251
  • Reputation: 1,061
HUDDLER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 10:00 AM

lol at all the misinformation in here.

#17 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,171
  • Reputation: 472
HUDDLER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 10:40 AM

http://www.examiner....r-running-backs

Yeah...no clue where anyone would get such misinformation.

The team had a similar situation with linebackers Dan Morgan and Will Witherspoon. They couldn't afford to pay two top-shelf linebackers, so they paid Morgan and let Witherspoon walk.



#18 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,251
  • Reputation: 1,061
HUDDLER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 11:45 AM

No disrespect to brad thomas, but he is leaving out facts that blow up his fan opinion.
I realize that no fan wants to believe their favorite player would turn down a good contract to remain with their team, but it happens all the time.

I remember the whole thing.
Morgan was our mlb. Spoon was our wlb that could backup mlb, but was far from a difference maker at the mlb position. The panthers offered spoon a contract that was very much in line with starting olb at the time. The rams offered him a larger contract to be their mlb. He followed the money. I don't blame him. He was never the mlb the rams thought he could be. These are all facts. Sorry your memory has failed you, and has you relying on the belief that the player turned down a contract from the Panthers. If you still doubt me, shoot gantt an email.

Edited by pantherclaw, 21 May 2010 - 12:19 PM.


#19 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • Joined: 02-December 08
  • posts: 5,591
  • Reputation: 173
SUPPORTER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 12:18 PM

so you are linking to a writer that has no clue. That's great.

I remember the whole thing.
Morgan was our mlb. Spoon was our wlb that could backup mlb, but was far from a difference maker at the mlb position. The panthers offered spoon a contract that was very much in line with starting olb at the time. The rams offered him a larger contract to be their mlb. He followed the money. I don't blame him. He was never the mlb the rams thought he could be. These are all facts. Sorry your memory has you relying on a writer that doesn't even cover the panthers. If you still doubt me, shoot gantt an email.


qft

#20 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,469
  • Reputation: 1,719
HUDDLER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 01:24 PM

Morgan had already signed in either 04 or 05, and after the 05 season, we had no starting RB's on the team and the organization made Foster a priority over Spoon. That did not work out, or maybe it did. We ended up getting Beason later on anyway and was able to give Davis a shot. And Pantherclaw is correct, the Rams wanted and paid him as a MLB, which is higher paid in a 4-3 system than an OLB.

Edited by Peppers90 NC, 21 May 2010 - 01:26 PM.


#21 Woodie

Woodie

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,215
  • Reputation: 143
HUDDLER

Posted 21 May 2010 - 04:25 PM

pretty much that.

IIRC back then the front office basically had to decide whether to extend dan morgan or witherspoon - they decided to re-sign morgan. thus, spoon then moved on and signed a big deal with the rams, who wanted him to start at the MLB spot; that didn't work out, so he was shipped out of town a couple of seasons later...

Nope. They left the offer to Witherspoon on the table even after Morgan re-signed. In fact, they even upped the offer a bit when he was being courted by the Rams, but were not willing to overspend for him.

So despite the misinformed opinion some have, it was never an either/or situation between them.