Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CatMan72

Just got back from OTA practice today...

43 posts in this topic

I guess if your choices are Andersen, Connor and Beason than it may make the most sense to put Connor in the middle, but the MLB is the quarterback of the defense and is in a much better position to react and make plays all over the field than an OLB.

I am glad that they are experimenting, this may be good evidence that the Davis injury is serious...

I think Derrick Brooks might have a few things to tell you about the Tampa 2 and the position of weakside linebacker...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Brian Witherspoon get any looks at both return positions and if so, how did he look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Derrick Brooks might have a few things to tell you about the Tampa 2 and the position of weakside linebacker...

^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In the defensive scheme that Meeks runs, the WLB is the most important LB. He is the guy that they funnel plays to. The WLB needs to be somebody that is atheletic enough to go sideline to sideline through traffic and a great tackler.

This was the main reason that Davis was blowing it up last year. The scheme the D runs now is made so that your WLB is a star.

It would make a ton of sense to move Beason to WLB. He is easily our most athletic LB and is very sound in his tackling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Derrick Brooks might have a few things to tell you about the Tampa 2 and the position of weakside linebacker...

I understand the WLB is a playmaker in the Tampa-2 but the MLB is still the guy that makes pre-snap adjustments and is in the best position to range all over the field.

I don't have anything against Beason playing OLB if the Panthers determine that is the best course of action, it just blew my mind a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anything one who was returning kicks/punts? and if they were doing good or slacking as always?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, Moore seemed to have some difficulty with accuracy today. Saw him sail a ball way over Jarrett's head on a deep route and then under throw another pass out on the flat (dumping the ball off under pressure).

Meanwhile, Clausen seemed to connect on just about everything he threw - but I don't recall seeing him attempt throw anything deep - he threw mostly short passes. I'm a Moore fan, and I want to see him do well - so I don't have an agenda here... just going off what I recall seeing.

mark my words. clausen will be the starter when the season starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just envision Moore having this mental breakdown in a press conference where he shits in his hand and chunks it at Darin Gantt and the team announces that Clausen is the starter the next day.

He hasn't taken the drafting of Clausen well AT ALL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Brian Witherspoon get any looks at both return positions and if so, how did he look?

Didn't notice, sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anything one who was returning kicks/punts? and if they were doing good or slacking as always?

Didn't see them working on that today. They were working on blocking for the punt not returns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just envision Moore having this mental breakdown in a press conference where he shits in his hand and chunks it at Darin Gantt and the team announces that Clausen is the starter the next day.

He hasn't taken the drafting of Clausen well AT ALL.

Wow. That would rocket past the Jim Mora "Playoffs??" rant in the legendary press conference world rankings. Perhaps even move in front of John Cheney threatening to kill John Calipari.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined