hunter cantwell
#1
Posted 08 July 2010 - 04:29 PM
Thoughts
#2
Posted 08 July 2010 - 04:35 PM
I know there was a lot of news about guys talking him up but do you think this was just a ploy to take some steam out of Clausens sail. I think Cantwell doesn't make the team.
Thoughts
I think there is no way that Pike can be stashed away on the practice squad without another team picking him up. Either Cantwell or Pike come down with an "injury" and get IR'd, or Cantwell gets cut and the Panthers attempt to stash him on the practice squad.
#3
Posted 08 July 2010 - 04:45 PM
#4
Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:40 PM
Pike was drafted in the 6th round. 6th rounders aint that far off from undrafted.
Cantwell has a stronger arm, bigger frame and already knows the system and played well during last preseason.
They player that plays better out of the two at camp/preseason will make it. Remember Cantwell atm is still #2 on the depth chart.
#5
Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:44 PM
The best players with the most potential should make the team. It doesn't matter whether they were drafted or not.
Pike was drafted in the 6th round. 6th rounders aint that far off from undrafted.
Cantwell has a stronger arm, bigger frame and already knows the system and played well during last preseason.
They player that plays better out of the two at camp/preseason will make it. Remember Cantwell atm is still #2 on the depth chart.
The only reason I think that Cantwell makes the team is because Pike has the same accuracy issues with a weaker arm. It just goes to show you that your W/L record in college (Pike, The Golden Calf of Bristol, etc.) means you were on a good team but doesn't necessarily mean you are a good NFL caliber quarterback.
#6
Posted 09 July 2010 - 11:29 AM
#7
Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:11 PM
#8
Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:34 PM
#9
Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:48 PM
#10
Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:50 PM
#11
Posted 09 July 2010 - 02:06 PM
What amazes me, is that, both Cantwell and Pike will probably be upgrades over any 2nd string QB John Fox has had in his entire tenure here. Of course, I'm not counting Matt Moore, because he was never really the clear cut #2, because they kept bringing in veterans.
They won't be second string.
#12
Posted 09 July 2010 - 02:32 PM
They won't be second string.
Well I was comparing them to Panthers 2nd string QB's from recent history, but I wouldn't completely rule them out for this year either, especially since Cantwell has already been here a year. I mean, what if Cantwell clearly out performs Clausen everyday in practice and in the pre season? I wouldn't just assume that John Fox will go with Clausen, based on draft status alone, unless he's ordered to do so by Mr. Richardson.
#13
Posted 09 July 2010 - 03:16 PM
The Big Cat aint usually one to tell the coaches how to run the team unless there is a major salary cap issue involved.Well I was comparing them to Panthers 2nd string QB's from recent history, but I wouldn't completely rule them out for this year either, especially since Cantwell has already been here a year. I mean, what if Cantwell clearly out performs Clausen everyday in practice and in the pre season? I wouldn't just assume that John Fox will go with Clausen, based on draft status alone, unless he's ordered to do so by Mr. Richardson.
#14
Posted 10 July 2010 - 08:28 AM
Well I was comparing them to Panthers 2nd string QB's from recent history, but I wouldn't completely rule them out for this year either, especially since Cantwell has already been here a year. I mean, what if Cantwell clearly out performs Clausen everyday in practice and in the pre season? I wouldn't just assume that John Fox will go with Clausen, based on draft status alone, unless he's ordered to do so by Mr. Richardson.
Unless we are all wrong, me, Hurney, every other panther fan, Clausen will not be 3rd string.
He will be active on gamedays.
#15
Posted 10 July 2010 - 08:48 AM
By the way, Steve Berlein was pretty good and a backup to Collins for a while before starting here. IMO, He was the best backup we ever had because I think he is our best QB ever.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





