Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Zod

Armanti Edwards....

387 posts in this topic

Was talking to DG yesterday. He made an interesting point that if Armanti continues to struggle and cannot seem to get the punt return job he may not make the active squad this season. My thinking is that no matter what he makes the squad based solely on the pride of the front office and what they spent to draft him.

Thoughts>?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is that last WR this FO has drafted that was worth a poo.

I wonder how Mardy Gilyard is doing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So he's not enough of a value to have at WR only if he can't do PR? Wow, that makes them look pretty silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He wouldn't make the squad today as only a WR. He has to be able to get the punt returns job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is that last WR this FO has drafted that was worth a poo.

I wonder how Mardy Gilyard is doing

Seriously this needs to end I hate to say it but Smitty is getting old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't put him on the practice squad, New England would ****** him up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's up Zod I'm real new to this but its ok I'm getting better. That's why simply put (even though I like the kid and all his talents) he shoulda been drafted in the fourth round no trade. That just wasn't necessary to give up valuable picks in the future. But I'm defiantly not trying to stir that up its just the truth of the situation or we should've stuck wit the normal bpa....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't put him on the practice squad, New England would snatch him up.

No, he won't be practice squad, but they can find a reason to deactivate him for a season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last time they put a third rounder on the practice squad? I don't even think they did that with Rashad Butler.

If Edwards can't return punts, he'll start limping around the facility on the coach's instructions and be placed on IR with a mystery hammy pull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will make the team..but wont see a lot of playing time because Moore will take his spot in the slot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same people defending Hillary a few months ago are now drawing the conclusion that Flynn... and by association Trump... must be guilty of something because Flynn is getting immunity from the FBI. Works both ways. For the record... IMHO both Hillary and Trump are crooks.  If justice in this nation were truly blind these two politicians and their henchmen would be doing a long stretch in prison by now.
    • Slot receivers don't exist in 2 TE sets unless we're lining a TE on the outside which I haven't seen much out of the currently constructed Panthers. Maybe McCaffrey if he were to be split out wide but the Panthers usually keep a RB with Cam in-case Cam needs the extra protection and audibles the RB to block.  The Panthers would be best suited pairing KB with a speedster such as Charles Johnson, who's adept at running deep routes. Keep Howard and possible the RB (if not blocking) on short routes, KB on working the intermediate routes, Olsen running intermediate/deep routes, and Johnson running deep routes. That way Cam has a receiver on every level. All of this assumes Shula constructs a properly worked passing attack. 
    • Yes, that is correct. My point being Clinton was impeached and stayed in office. Almost everyone calling for impeachment of Trump thinks it means to remove him from office. He would have to be impeached and then found guilty to do that. The impeachment alone does not remove him. And my original point, no one was bringing up the electoral college back then. It makes no sense. Because the popular would surely rid us of corrupt politicians, right?