Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Replacing Peppers production....


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
33 replies to this topic

#1 SorthNarolina

SorthNarolina

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,408
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:20 PM

We still have 1 more week to see how well we will cope without Peppers. I felt like looking at the amount of snaps and sacks the guys we have are producing right now.

I used profootballfocus.com for the snaps. I just estimated how much sacks our guys got for how many snaps they took. I'm estimating for the rookies.

I'm really tired so I don't feel like explaining the math. I'll explain tomorrow.

Charles Johnson 7 in 700
Tyler Brayton 4 in 600 -
Everette Brown 5 in 500
Greg Hardy 4 in 400
Eric Norwood 4 in 400
Jon Beason 4 in 1000
Dan Connor 1 in 1000
James Anderson 2 in 300
Sherrod Martin 1 in 1000
Charles Godfrey 1 in 1000
Richard Marshall 1 in 1000
Captain Munnerlynn 1 in 500

this gives us 35 sacks. I think I'm being a little optimistic but not at a homer level.

#2 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,190
  • Reputation: 1,566
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:21 PM

To much math. :)

#3 Future of the Funchise

Future of the Funchise

    The Ambassador of Booty

  • Joined: 16-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,011
  • Reputation: 826
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:28 PM

Posted Image

#4 SorthNarolina

SorthNarolina

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,408
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:30 PM

the first number is their sacks for the season, the 2nd number is their estimated snaps from their positions based on the projections from the last few years.

#5 Chaos

Chaos

    @chaos_cltsports

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 10,262
  • Reputation: 4,832
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:34 PM

the first number is their sacks for the season, the 2nd number is their estimated snaps from their positions based on the projections from the last few years.


You put together this complex yet thought-provoking thread, I try very hard to focus on the topic, but then I glance at your av and all I can think about now are Jello pudding pops.

Dammit, of course I don't have any.

#6 Future of the Funchise

Future of the Funchise

    The Ambassador of Booty

  • Joined: 16-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,011
  • Reputation: 826
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:35 PM

You put together this complex yet thought-provoking thread, I try very hard to focus on the topic, but then I glance at your av and all I can think about now are Jello pudding pops.

Dammit, of course I don't have any.


Jello... Just because there's always room for it doesn't mean it's always there.
Like love in your heart for an x who you sleep with regularly...

#7 Sawyer

Sawyer

    "Tiny Mite football dad"

  • Joined: 02-August 10
  • PipPip
  • posts: 23
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:40 PM

Brayton gets less than 4, probably 2, Brown gets more along the lines of 8, Leonard,Johnson and Tyler will combine for around 4-5. For the most part however, it looks pretty much in my line of thinking.

#8 ed bell

ed bell

    Ruthless

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 3,138
  • Reputation: 840
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:40 PM

One thing I am looking forward to in regards to the move of Beason is the increased opportunity for QB pressure from him...It has the chance of being a huge addition to the defense's potential....Beason chasing sacks can only be a good thing..

#9 tarheelpride

tarheelpride

    Logic is optional

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 2,922
  • Reputation: 33
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:47 PM

in terms of taking plays off and disappearing, Jarrett can fill that role 100%

#10 Future of the Funchise

Future of the Funchise

    The Ambassador of Booty

  • Joined: 16-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,011
  • Reputation: 826
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:50 PM

in terms of taking plays off and disappearing, Jarrett can fill that role 100%


i only gave you pie because i want to sex your sig

#11 tarheelpride

tarheelpride

    Logic is optional

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 2,922
  • Reputation: 33
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:51 PM

i only gave you pie because i want to sex your sig


If only I could find out who the hell she is....

#12 Future of the Funchise

Future of the Funchise

    The Ambassador of Booty

  • Joined: 16-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,011
  • Reputation: 826
HUDDLER

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:56 PM

when you do let me know.