Fox runs the stalest offense in football.
#1
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:19 AM
#2
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:22 AM
#3
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:43 AM
But fwiw, if you run 5 plays, and you run them well, then it doesn't matter. The Redskins won a few Superbowls and had a relatively simple playbook, running a lot of traps and sweeps.
#4
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:48 AM
#5
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:49 AM
time for a new coach
#6
Posted 14 August 2010 - 09:54 AM
#7
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:01 AM
#8
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:01 AM
#9
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:06 AM
#10
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:12 AM
I don't know why I didn't notice it sooner (like years ago). I noticed how we for the most part run like 5 plays all game. We change tha play ever so slighty that so it doesn't mirror the or original, but if you pay attention you can tell. The sweeps, the handoffs, the smoke passes to Smitty, and crossing patterns with the slot recievers. I don't know if its Jeff Davidson, or Fox, but my god.........
Fox's O is not as stale and boring as your threads.
#11
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:15 AM
Fox's O is not as stale and boring as your threads.
i disagree.its bout the same but more inlikely worst. dive, lead, maybe playaction or draw than punt.
#12
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:15 AM
#13
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:18 AM
#14
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:20 AM
Some of the more electric teams I can think of (Colts and Saints for example) put it in the air a lot, but there is no trickery to it. Great QB's who get great protection and time to make the throws downfield.
I like our offense - just wish we had more weapons at receiver.
#15
Posted 14 August 2010 - 10:24 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





