Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Predict Your Team's Record


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
186 replies to this topic

#141 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,772
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 02:10 PM

He's only had one full year to recruit. He is also bringing in a new system. All the players before were recruited for a different offensive scheme.

#142 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 6,862
  • Reputation: 1,133
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 02:53 PM

He's only had one full year to recruit. He is also bringing in a new system. All the players before were recruited for a different offensive scheme.


Which is why you recruit players on offense to fit into the system. He has not done that. He basically had Driskel fall into his lap, and the kid looked like he had never played football in his life last season. A season in which he had arguably one the best QB coaches in football.

#143 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,772
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:24 PM

Which is why you recruit players on offense to fit into the system. He has not done that. He basically had Driskel fall into his lap, and the kid looked like he had never played football in his life last season. A season in which he had arguably one the best QB coaches in football.


He didn't recruit Driskel, Urban did. That's why when Urban left he had to "reconsider" his decision. I like Brissett better for our offense anyways.

The incoming freshman this year are his first complete class and has players that better fit the system like RB Matt Jones.

#144 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 6,862
  • Reputation: 1,133
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:28 PM

He didn't recruit Driskel, Urban did. That's why when Urban left he had to "reconsider" his decision. I like Brissett better for our offense anyways.

The incoming freshman this year are his first complete class and has players that better fit the system like RB Matt Jones.


Hence why I said he basically had Driskel fall into his lap...

Driskel is perfect for his system. He was the highest rated pro-style QB in that class.

The fact is, Muchamp failed to bring in depth on offense, but overloaded the defense with talent. He won't last long if he continues to do that.

#145 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,772
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:33 PM

Driskel is not a pro-style QB. He is a run first QB.

#146 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 6,862
  • Reputation: 1,133
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 04:22 PM

Ok, what? Just because he is mobile doesn't mean he isn't pro-style. He is 100% a pass-first QB. Brisset is the dual-threat QB.

#147 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,445
  • Reputation: 1,075
HUDDLER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:11 PM

USC Trojans

Hawaii: W
@Syracuse: W
@Stanford: W
Cal: W
@Utah: W
@Washington: W
Colorado: W
@Arizona: W
Oregon: W
Arizona State: W
@fUCLA: W
Notre Dame: W
Pac 12 Title Game against Oregon (hosted by USC): W
BCS National Title Game against Alabama: W (24-17)

Kind of predictable, but fug it. I've had to miss watching my team in a BCS game for two years and I'm giddy for what could happen this season. I wan't nothing more for USC to send the biggest fug you to the NCAA by winning the Natty under sanctions. It's definitely possible with the weapons Barkley has, a solid running game from Curtis "Moody" McNeal and D.J. Morgan, and a defense that has elite speed and talent again. A lot will hinge on how the D-Line copes with the loss of Perry and Harris, but USC may very well have the best LB corp, and one of the best secondaries next year. Should be an exciting year at the Coliseum....

#148 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,772
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 18 April 2012 - 11:45 PM

Ok, what? Just because he is mobile doesn't mean he isn't pro-style. He is 100% a pass-first QB. Brisset is the dual-threat QB.


I guess run first QB is a bit strong of a term but he is most certainly a Dual QB, that's why Urban wanted him. He want to use his running ability to run the speed option. In HS he had almost as many running yards as passing yards.

As far as Brissett being a dual-threat, that's crazy. He is not fleet of foot. He's not what you call a mobile QB. He is likes to stay in the pocket.

#149 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 6,862
  • Reputation: 1,133
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:41 AM

I guess run first QB is a bit strong of a term but he is most certainly a Dual QB, that's why Urban wanted him. He want to use his running ability to run the speed option. In HS he had almost as many running yards as passing yards.

As far as Brissett being a dual-threat, that's crazy. He is not fleet of foot. He's not what you call a mobile QB. He is likes to stay in the pocket.


You have to look at Driskel's designed running plays vs. his passing plays. He threw from the pocket or in roll-out situations far more than he ran on any designed runs. I do acknowledge that he can make things happen when the pocket breaks down. He is a pass-first QB who can run. He is similar to an Andrew Luck.

Brisset is definitely a dual-threat QB. Brisset is to UF what Cam Newton is to Carolina. A QB that has a nose for the first down marker, but isn't exceptionally fast. Watching Driskel run is a little different. He is more athletic, but he doesn't seem to be able to read defenders when running. That's why I think he is a pocket QB if he wants to succeed.

I hope that I am wrong about Muschamp and I hope he can show improvement this year. I think it's pretty clear that Jeremy Foley wants to see significant improvement this year. Muschamp's seat is very warm. I think we all remember Urban Meyer's 9-3 and 13-1 records in his first two seasons at UF.

#150 DirtyMagic97

DirtyMagic97

    YNWA

  • Joined: 04-December 09
  • posts: 6,862
  • Reputation: 1,133
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:46 AM

USC Trojans

Hawaii: W
@Syracuse: W
@Stanford: W
Cal: W
@Utah: W
@Washington: W
Colorado: W
@Arizona: W
Oregon: W
Arizona State: W
@fUCLA: W
Notre Dame: W
Pac 12 Title Game against Oregon (hosted by USC): W
BCS National Title Game against Alabama: W (24-17)

Kind of predictable, but fug it. I've had to miss watching my team in a BCS game for two years and I'm giddy for what could happen this season. I wan't nothing more for USC to send the biggest fug you to the NCAA by winning the Natty under sanctions. It's definitely possible with the weapons Barkley has, a solid running game from Curtis "Moody" McNeal and D.J. Morgan, and a defense that has elite speed and talent again. A lot will hinge on how the D-Line copes with the loss of Perry and Harris, but USC may very well have the best LB corp, and one of the best secondaries next year. Should be an exciting year at the Coliseum....


I bet you want your stab at an SEC team in that national championship :lol:

I like USC to win it all this year as well. They have a really good team with a favorable, but at times challenging schedule.