Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Analysis: Preseason Game 3

86 posts in this topic

Posted

i dont think the PR is on the current roster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I feel like the offense maybe finally starting to get into rhythm with each other, the plays that were made during the 2:00 mark in the first half were nice. Not saying they were great but, getting better. Defense is astounding, hopefully this is the new face of the Carolina D, no mercy. I liked what I saw from Guy and kudos for his dreads being awesome. I can't remember exactly what plays he was good on but I remember trying to think of who 84 was. Overall glad we got the win and hope the offense gels more in the next game to hopefully be ready for NYG so we can punish them again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

While I watch the Panthers religiously, I cannot say that I fully understand the game, so bear with me . . . we have three TEs that can catch and block, so why do we not line one of them up as the slot receiver? There has been a lot of discussion of various wideouts, and there is definitely a need for a second receiver behind Smith, but no receiver we have brought in since the Moose of old has been very impressive. It might be true that King cannot really run after the catch, but he drops very few balls. Barnidge and Rosario can run quite well, and they have better hands than a lot of the receivers we have auditioned. So, before I go off thinking I am a football genius, could one of you far more knowledgeable people explain why this idea is ridiculous?

Might sound a bit simplistic, but there are reasons why TEs are TEs.

The guys we have would be much more likely to swap spots with a fullback than a wide receiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Might sound a bit simplistic, but there are reasons why TEs are TEs.

The guys we have would be much more likely to swap spots with a fullback than a wide receiver.

Pretty sure there was at least one point at which a TE did line up as fullback on Saturday, but I may just be delusional (the stream I was watching had such poor quality at some points I couldn't see jersey numbers).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pretty sure there was at least one point at which a TE did line up as fullback on Saturday, but I may just be delusional (the stream I was watching had such poor quality at some points I couldn't see jersey numbers).

You did indeed see that. From memory, I think it was Rosario, but I'd need to look back at the tape to be sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You did indeed see that. From memory, I think it was Rosario, but I'd need to look back at the tape to be sure.

It was Rosario and personally I thought that was a very cleverly designed play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pretty sure there was at least one point at which a TE did line up as fullback on Saturday, but I may just be delusional (the stream I was watching had such poor quality at some points I couldn't see jersey numbers).

Rosario went into motion and lined up as FB, which had the defense confused. Well designed play, considering Rosario is more of a passing option when he's on the field. The offense did seem to use a lot of motion in this game, compared to others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nice post Mr. Scot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I understand that King is a great blocker. but im sorry, im taking a chance on the big play guy. Give Barnidge the starting nod. you can't leave that much offensive fire wasting away like it.
As much as we play from the two tight end set, I think it's a moot point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm confused on what happened in Indy? Did Meeks just need a defensive minded team, I'm impressed.
Really?

Indy spends 80% of it's money on offense.

Nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Great observations as usual Scott.

Just wanted to add a few things.

Gettis really had a nice showing saturday night. He shows great awareness, good body control, and catching the ball with his hands. This is a kid the team needs to keep on the team.

Dwayne Jarrett, I'm to the point that I just don't care about. If they keep him, fine, as long as it doesn't cost us Gettis.

Something else that I haven't seen mentioned, is the play of our defensive tackles.

Everyone has been most worried about out defensive tackles, but they have been playing very well...specially Saturday night, keeping the offensive linemen from getting their hands on our linebackers, allowing them to flow to the ball, and make plays. Without the play of our defensive tackles, our talent at linebacker wouldn't be showing like it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Something else that I haven't seen mentioned, is the play of our defensive tackles.

Everyone has been most worried about out defensive tackles, but they have been playing very well...specially Saturday night, keeping the offensive linemen from getting their hands on our linebackers, allowing them to flow to the ball, and make plays. Without the play of our defensive tackles, our talent at linebacker wouldn't be showing like it is.

I have complimented them a few times, they have attacked the middle allowing our ends to have quite a few sacks on the inside of the tackles rather than on the outside.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites